On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:11, kristian.fiskerstr...@sumptuouscapital.com
said:
> Speaking of which, with libgcrypt 1.7.0 this has the fun variant of
> (note the 3x RSA, without distinguishing -S and -E)
be98b59 gpg: Do not show "MD5" and triplicated "RSA" in --version.
Thanks,
Werner
--
Die
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/28/2014 11:57 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 23:27, 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net
> said:
>> 1.4.16: RSA, RSA-E, RSA-S, ELG-E, DSA
>>
>> 2.0.26: RSA, ELG, DSA
>>
>> Is this actually a change in what is supported, or ju
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 23:27, 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net said:
> 1.4.16: RSA, RSA-E, RSA-S, ELG-E, DSA
>
> 2.0.26: RSA, ELG, DSA
>
> Is this actually a change in what is supported, or just how GnuPG
> reports it?
No. RSA-E and RSA-S are the same as RSA. They merely use different
algor
Hi
I only just noticed that among the output of "gpg --version" I get
different lists of supported public key algorithms between versions
1.4.16 and 2.0.26.
1.4.16: RSA, RSA-E, RSA-S, ELG-E, DSA
2.0.26: RSA, ELG, DSA
Is this actually a change in what is supported, or just how GnuPG
reports it
