Re: Problems with two active encryption subkeys

2010-11-11 Thread Sven Klomp
On Thursday 11 November 2010 12:58:26 Hauke Laging wrote: > > Thus, other software may behave differently. I think, I > > have to revoke one key to avoid problems... > > Why should any problems arise from that? As long as the sender can encrypt > and > the recipient can decrypt... Doesn't matt

Re: Problems with two active encryption subkeys

2010-11-11 Thread Hauke Laging
Am Donnerstag 11 November 2010 09:50:30 schrieb Sven Klomp: > > encrypts for 1860836B not for the both longer and longer valid DA63AFDA. > > So the decision is done in the implementation and not covered in the > OpenPGP standard. This conclusion cannot be drawn from the gpg behaviour, of cours

Re: Problems with two active encryption subkeys

2010-11-11 Thread Sven Klomp
On Wednesday 10 November 2010 20:20:13 Hauke Laging wrote: > I created some more subkeys to check that... > > For 2.0.15 you are right in one point and wrong in the other. It is the newer > creation date which is chosen not the longer remaining validity period. But > the newer key wins against t

Re: Problems with two active encryption subkeys

2010-11-10 Thread Hauke Laging
Am Mittwoch 10 November 2010 19:52:00 schrieb MFPA: > > AFAIK gpg takes the (compatible) subkey which is valid > > for the longest remaining period. > > I thought Gunpg used the largest available subkey for the task, and > multiple appropriate sukeys were of the same size the newest would be > us

Re: Problems with two active encryption subkeys

2010-11-10 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Wednesday 10 November 2010 at 3:21:21 PM, in , Hauke Laging wrote: > AFAIK gpg takes the (compatible) subkey which is valid > for the longest remaining period. I thought Gunpg used the largest available subkey for the task, and multiple a

Re: Problems with two active encryption subkeys

2010-11-10 Thread Hauke Laging
Am Mittwoch 10 November 2010 15:38:39 schrieb Sven Klomp: > I have a public key configuration as follows: > Primary Key (DSA for signing other keys) > - Sub-key 1 (Elgamal for encryption) > - Sub-key 2 (RSA for signing mails/files) > - Sub-key 3 (RSA for encryption) > > How does GnuPG decide, wha

Re: Problems with two active encryption subkeys

2010-11-10 Thread Sven Klomp
Hi, On Friday 05 November 2010 11:58:13 Sven Klomp wrote: > since I bought a Crypto Stick [1], I had to add an additional RSA sub-key for > encryption, since the stick doesn't support Elgamal. Thus, I have two > encryption keys in my public keyring now. How does gpg decide which one to > use fo

Problems with two active encryption subkeys

2010-11-05 Thread Sven Klomp
Hi, since I bought a Crypto Stick [1], I had to add an additional RSA subkey for encryption, since the stick doesn't support Elgamal. Thus, I have two encryption keys in my public keyring now. How does gpg decide which one to use for encryption? I thought, that every key is used and I can decid