On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:32:44 -0500, Peter C Chapin said:
> the workaround described in the September posts was shown to possibly not
> work in the October posts and no resolution was discussed. Am I to
> conclude that gpg simply can't reliably encrypt multi-gigabyte files on
It definitely can. T
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Alphax wrote:
> http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2005-September/026646.html
>
> http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2005-October/027259.html
>
> http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2006-February/028073.html
>
> and their replies.
Thanks for the
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Werner Koch wrote:
> It definitely can. The safe why of doing so is by using i/o
> redirection; i.e.:
>
> gpg -e plain.gpg
>
> This way the size of PLAIN is irrelevant to gpg. The shell (cmd.exe)
> is responsible for opening the files the correct way.
Hmmm. The post here
Peter C. Chapin wrote:
> Hello! I've googled a bit on this problem but I have not so far found
> anything helpful.
>
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2005-September/026646.html
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2005-October/027259.html
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnu
Hello! I've googled a bit on this problem but I have not so far found
anything helpful.
I am using gpg v1.4.2 on Windows (*not* the Cygwin version of gpg). I
recently encrypted a rather large archive file... over 6 GBytes. However,
when I tried to decrypt it using exactly the same gpg program, I
