On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:33:07AM -0700, Kurt Fitzner wrote:
> I am contemplating a change to my GnuPG Explorer Extension, but I need
> some background information.
>
> I know that encrypting a file without signing it is commonly done with
> symmetrical encryption. My question is, do people com
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:33:07 -0700, Kurt Fitzner said:
> I know that encrypting a file without signing it is commonly done with
> symmetrical encryption. My question is, do people commonly use GnuPG to
> encrypt a file without signing it using PK-encryption?
In email I use it when I have no acce
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Kurt Fitzner wrote:
I am contemplating a change to my GnuPG Explorer Extension, but I need
some background information.
I know that encrypting a file without signing it is commonly done with
symmetrical encryption. My question is, do people commonly use GnuPG to
encrypt
Kurt Fitzner wrote:
I know that encrypting a file without signing it is commonly done with
symmetrical encryption. My question is, do people commonly use GnuPG to
encrypt a file without signing it using PK-encryption?
Well that's totally up to your personal taste =)
Personally, I don't t
I am contemplating a change to my GnuPG Explorer Extension, but I need
some background information.
I know that encrypting a file without signing it is commonly done with
symmetrical encryption. My question is, do people commonly use GnuPG to
encrypt a file without signing it using PK-encryption?
