On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:23:06PM +0200, Thomas Hühn wrote:
> I think I have missed that mail. Could someone mail it to me, please?
>
> Or is it a web site? Google doesn't know about it.
http://www.kernelconcepts.de/products/Smartcard-HOWTO.txt
___
Gn
Am Freitag 01 April 2005 13:57 schrieb Peter L. Smilde:
> "OpenPGP smartcard HOWTO", section "Advanced features", subsection
> "Using the card only for subkeys".
I think I have missed that mail. Could someone mail it to me, please?
Or is it a web site? Google doesn't know about it.
Thomas
Jan Niehusmann schrieb:
> Isn't this exactly the approach described in the thread "Clarification
> on purpose of subordinate keys" two days ago? There was a very nice
> step-by-step description posted by Dirk Traulsen.
You're right. I already knew the "purpose", but the thread clarified
this speci
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 01:57:51PM +0200, Peter L. Smilde wrote:
> This is OK for the offline secret keyring. But my online secret keyring
> shouldn't contain the secret primary keysigning key (as before).
Isn't this exactly the approach described in the thread "Clarification
on purpose of subordi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Another question araised while testing my new OpenPGP smartcard:
I have an offline keysigning key and would like to add a signing and an
encryption key to it for online use, with the secret parts of the last
two on the smartcard. So I performe
