On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> My purpose was more to get the OP thinking in terms
> of better procedures for an automated process, and to try to point out
> that the current behavior of gnupg doesn't seem to be a bug.
>
>
> hth,
>
> Doug
>
That's still what I'm confused ab
Sven Radde wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Andrew Flerchinger schrieb:
>>> 1. Use mktemp to safely create a new, unique file
>>> 2. Send the decryption output to that file
>>> 3. Test if the "real" file exists, and if so unlink it
>>> 4. mv $newfile $realfilename
>>>
>> You're right, I could do that to make
Hi!
Andrew Flerchinger schrieb:
>> 1. Use mktemp to safely create a new, unique file
>> 2. Send the decryption output to that file
>> 3. Test if the "real" file exists, and if so unlink it
>> 4. mv $newfile $realfilename
>>
> You're right, I could do that to make my work-around act atomic.
Be
