ey: No secret key
> gpg: clear-sign dialed: No secret key
Please always post complete gpg comand lines and the corresponding output -
you can of course obfuscate names and other personal info.
I assume you have entered something like:
gpg --clear-sign test.txt
without specifiying the key
Sirs and ladie!
I received this message when using --clear-sign.
gpg: no default secret key: No secret key
gpg: clear-sign dialed: No secret key
Both my public and private key has been imported.
The key was made with a different user (as sudo)The current user is a non-sudo
user.
Yours truly
Please don't send HTML to this list.
gpg: key "6O0PDA84A36B6C98B261AC2020546703CDADFA53" not found
That's not a valid key ID. Key IDs are strings of hexadecimal digits.
Your second 'digit' there is the letter O, which is not a valid hexit.
gpg --delete-secret-keys CDSXFA53
That's not a
I get these endearing messages.
I cannot sign my message with the key.
I cannot delete the secret key.
I can decrypt with the secret key
gpg: signing failed: No secret key
gpg: message: clear-sign failed: No secret key
gpg: key "6O0PDA84A36B6C98B261AC2020546703CDADFA53" not
Hi Robert,
I am trying to write in plain text mode so hopefully you won't be
seeing it in HTML.
I really appreciate the help you have provided me so far.
I am really not into networking and encryption stuff, so please expect
few dumb questions from me.
Can you please suggest to me the steps that
I am trying to write in plain text mode so hopefully you won't be
seeing it in HTML.
Success! Thank you.
Can you please suggest to me the steps that I should follow to
redesign my solution, considering the password security?
I already have, twice.
For the third time: remove the passphrase
I am writing this email to you in plain text... I am surprised how is it
coming to as HTML.
Any idea?
Any special things I need to check before sending the email?
-Regards
Abhisht Sharma
+61 420410228
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021, 02:58 Robert J. Hansen, wrote:
> I'm not going to respond to this until
Please note that the resolution of this problem is really critical so any
quick help will be highly appreciated!
-Regards
Abhisht Sharma
+61 420410228
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021, 09:18 Abhisht Sharma, wrote:
> I am writing this email to you in plain text... I am surprised how is it
> coming to as HTML
I am writing this email to you in plain text... I am surprised how is it
coming to as HTML.
As I don't use GMail, I can't help you. You'll need to ask Google.
Your message comes through as having both plaintext and HTML parts.
This, for instance, is part of the source of your email:
Content
But, this command had a risk of exposing *$PASSPHRASE* to the UNIX
console if any user executes *ps -ef* command while the code is running.
This was a huge security breach so I chose the *--passphrase-file*
option to read the decryption password from a file.
Now, all I need is to place the fil
I'm not going to respond to this until you re-send it as plain text
without HTML. The very first thing I wrote in my last email was that
this mailing list strongly prefers plain text without HTML.
We're willing to help you, but you need to follow the rules.
___
NCRYPTED_SOURCE_FILE *
The problem I mentioned in my original post starts from here.
The above command doesn't run and fails for "No secret Key found" issue and
runs fine if it is executed immediately after th
for scripting GnuPG tasks is to remove the passphrase from the certificate.
Step 3. To my wonder, when I execute Step 1 first and then Step 2
(within a short span), it works, but if I directly run Step 2 ( which
actually will be happening as a part of solution), then it doesn't and
fail
--quiet
--always-trust -o /home/output_file.dat -d
/etl/inbound/encrypted_file.dat.pgp
<https://gpgtools.tenderapp.com/discussions/nightly/2094-gpg-command-failing-for-no-secret-key?anon_token=c5d07b882#now-the-problem-comes-when-i-execute-above-command-and-it-fails-for-below-error->Now
the p
Thank you anon85786376!!
--
sergio.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, June 6, 2021 2:24 PM, sergio via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> I found the sequence to reproduce my problem:
>
> $ rm -rf .gnupg
> $ gpg --gen-key --batch < %echo Generating a 25519 key
> Key-Type: eddsa
> Key-Curve: Ed25519
> Key-Usage: cert
> Subkey-Type: ec
6EC0, created
2021-06-06
"test "
gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
$
Is this a gnupg bug or I'm doing something wrong?
--
sergio.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
I tried the same sequence on the same host A but for new test user with
clean ~/.gnupg without success. Could you help me to debug this, please.
--
sergio.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnup
> --export-secret-keys
Sorry, this is a typo, or course. And to be absolutely sure, I re-checked:
B $ gpg --import secret.key
gpg: key : public key "name (comment) " imported
gpg: key : secret key imported
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1
gpg: secret keys read:
rk on B:
B % echo test | gpg --encrypt --recipient | gpg --decrypt
gpg: encrypted with 256-bit ECDH key, ID , created
"name (comment) "
gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
gpg version is the same on both hosts: 2.2.27-2 from debian sid
$ gpg --list-secret-keys --with-subkey-finge
gpg --import private.key
But it doesn't work on B:
B % echo test | gpg --encrypt --recipient | gpg --decrypt
gpg: encrypted with 256-bit ECDH key, ID , created
"name (comment) "
gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
gpg version is the same on both hosts: 2.2.27-2 from debi
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:03, Patrick Ben Koetter said:
> $ gpg: Entschlüsselung fehlgeschlagen: Kein geheimer Schlüssel
(gpg: decryption failed: No secret key)
> $ gpg --version
> gpg (GnuPG) 2.2.24
Please update to 2.2.25 because of
* scd: Fix regression in 2.2.24 requiring gpg --ca
Greetings,
my PGP secret key is stored on a Yubikey security token and until recently I
would simply plug it into my computer and use it to encrypt/decrypt data. This
stopped working and now all I get is this unless I command gpg first to list
the card status using "gpg --card-status":
$ gpg: Ent
On 27/07/2020 22:53, Ayoub Misherghi wrote:
> With API I mean something like GPGME.
It seems to me that including options in gpg.conf that GPGME does not
expect people to put there might throw it out of whack.
> 1) It is preferable to have "--batch" on command line even in
> unattended operation;
With API I mean something like GPGME.
This is what came across to me:
1) It is preferable to have "--batch" on command line even in unattended
operation; and not in the gpg.conf file?
2) --pinentry-mode when needed goes in gpg.conf
3) --allow-loopback-pinentry when needed goes in gpg-age
The same thing happens when I give the option --no-batch on the command
line.
The problem seems to have gone away when I moved the config option
inentry-mode loopback
to the $HOME/.gnupg/gpg.conf from the $HOME/.ngupg/gpg-agent.conf
In the final version when development ends, I am going
On 27/07/2020 20:56, Ayoub Misherghi wrote:
> The same thing happens when I give the option --no-batch on the
> command line.
But that only passes --no-batch to gpg, not to gpg-agent. Werner said
you shouldn't put these options in your .conf-files. Please just include
--batch on the command line w
On 27/07/2020 11:17, Werner Koch wrote:
> of the "batch" option. This option should in general not be used for
> gpg-agent.
Which, by the way, is documented well in the man page gpg-agent(1):
--batch
Don't invoke a pinentry or do any other thing requiring human
On Sun, 26 Jul 2020 13:25, Ayoub Misherghi said:
> I am not asked for pass phrase.
Right; that is because:
> # Lines uncommented in $HOME/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf
> log-file $HOME/gpg-log.txt
> # The same thing happens when I comment this line out
> allow-loopback-pinentry
>
> batch
of the "batch"
On 20/07/2020 20:25, Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users wrote:
gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
Are your gpg.conf and gpg-agent.conf (or let's just say any .conf-file
in your GnuPG home, ~/.gnupg) empty? Do you get a pinentry popup asking
for a pas
On 20/07/2020 20:25, Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users wrote:
> gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
Are your gpg.conf and gpg-agent.conf (or let's just say any .conf-file
in your GnuPG home, ~/.gnupg) empty? Do you get a pinentry popup asking
for a passphrase?
Peter.
--
I use the GNU
-07-09
"develop1"
gpg: public key decryption failed: End of file
gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ gpg --list-secret-keys
/home/ayoub/.gnupg/pubring.kbx
--
sec ed25519 2020-07-09 [SC] [expired:
Hi Ingo,
On Sun, 05 Jan 2020 16:17:04 +0100
Ingo Klöcker wrote:
with your recipe
> all you have to do is to remove the file ~/.gnupg/.gpg-v21-migrated
the missing secret key was migrated again
and decryption is possible now :-)
The key listing now shows:
--- snip ---
Secret
h 4096-bit RSA key, ID 4BB3049F19616A80, created
> 2016-09-05 "Gabriele Pohl "
> gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
>
> The secret key is available:
>
> gpg> list
>
> sec rsa2048/9C7646202CE0CBB2
> created: 2012-09-05 expires: 2020-
an 3 13:07 test.txt.gpg
But decrypting fails:
$ gpg --verbose --decrypt test.txt.gpg
gpg: public key is 4BB3049F19616A80
gpg: using subkey 4BB3049F19616A80 instead of primary key 9C7646202CE0CBB2
gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit RSA key, ID 4BB3049F19616A80, created 2016-09-05
"Gabriele
Hi.
Am Mittwoch, den 08.08.2018, 00:03 -0400 schrieb Yu:
> WOW! That works.
>
> To document this, if anyone ever run into this situation:
>
> > sec# rsa4096/0xC9E7221DAFCE6539 created: 2018-08-07 expires:
> > never
>
> This is the key I need to delete from the card/yubikey.
>
> 1. gpg --del
WOW! That works.
To document this, if anyone ever run into this situation:
> sec# rsa4096/0xC9E7221DAFCE6539 created: 2018-08-07 expires: never
This is the key I need to delete from the card/yubikey.
1. gpg --delete-key 0xC9E7221DAFCE6539
2. gpg --card-status should return NONE and gpg --li
Hi.
Am Dienstag, den 07.08.2018, 19:38 -0400 schrieb Yu:
> Hi Dirk
> Thank you very much. I just want to make sure I am doing the right
> thing,
> so please excuse me if I am asking too much.
> > You should delete the complete secret key set from you keyring.
> Then
> > import the PUBLIC keys f
Hi Dirk
Thank you very much. I just want to make sure I am doing the right thing,
so please excuse me if I am asking too much.
You should delete the complete secret key set from you keyring. Then
> import the PUBLIC keys for the card keys and then do a gpg --card-
> status.
>
>
Do I just call "gp
> ssb# rsa4096/0xF7254D474BF6AD14 2018-08-07 [S]
> ssb# rsa4096/0xBAB7FE8D803C2351 2018-08-07 [E]
> ssb> rsa4096/0x676CA8641A239FE2 2018-08-07 [SA]
>
The # indicates, that the Keys are not available in the keyring.
> I am confused why I get this message:
>
> gpg:
-08-07 [SA]
I am confused why I get this message:
gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
I tried gpg --import but still doesn't help.
John-Wong:~ jwong$ gpg --import mastersub.key
gpg: key 0xC9E7221DAFCE6539: "John Wong " not changed
gpg: To migrate 'secring.gpg', w
On 17-09-24, azarus wrote:
> Hello GPG users,
>
> I have a problem regarding signing data. Whenever I try clear-signing,
> this appears:
>
[snip]
> This is what gpg -K lists:
>
> /home/azarus/.gnupg/pubring.kbx
> ---
> sec rsa4096 2016-12-20 [SC]
>
> uid
On 2017-09-24 at 17:34, azarus wrote:
> This is what gpg -K lists:
>
> /home/azarus/.gnupg/pubring.kbx
> ---
> sec rsa4096 2016-12-20 [SC]
>
> uid [ultimate]
> uid [ultimate]
> ssb rsa4096 2016-12-20 [E]
> ssb# rsa4096 2017-06-23 [SE]
On 09/24/2017 05:34 PM, azarus wrote:
> ssb# rsa4096 2017-06-23 [SE]
>
> Can somebody explain what I'm doing wrong?
A combined sign and encrypt capable subkey would be wrong #1, you likely
want to revoke this one and generate separate subkeys for the various
options.
Aditionally, they are stub
Hello GPG users,
I have a problem regarding signing data. Whenever I try clear-signing,
this appears:
gpg: writing to stdout
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
hello
gpg: signing failed: No secret key
gpg: [stdin]: clear-sign failed: No secret key
I invoked clearsign like this
Hello GPG users,
I have a problem regarding signing data. Whenever I try clear-signing,
this appears:
gpg: writing to stdout
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
hello
gpg: signing failed: No secret key
gpg: [stdin]: clear-sign failed: No secret key
I invoked clearsign like this
> On 8. Apr 2017, at 08:18, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I rsyncd my .gnupg-folder to a new computer (moving from Fedora to TrueOS).
> When I try to decrypt now something I get the message "no secret key
> available".
> But when I do gpg -K all my
Hi,
I rsyncd my .gnupg-folder to a new computer (moving from Fedora to TrueOS).
When I try to decrypt now something I get the message "no secret key
available".
But when I do gpg -K all my secret keys get listed and when I do gpg -k all
public keys are listed. gpg is a symlink to gp
-Original Message-
From: Gnupg-users [mailto:gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org] On Behalf Of Hariharan
Shweta
Thanks for the response. We have provided them our public key.
The key 31743B64 is not our public key. I'm confused as our vendor is able to
decrypt our message but we are not able
users [mailto:gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org] On Behalf Of Ben
McGinnes
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 2:40 PM
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Subject: Re: Decryption failed: No secret key found (Please help !)
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 06:22:39AM +, Hariharan Shweta wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
>
>
at their end. But we
> are not able to decrypt the message sent by the vendor to us.
[SNIP]
> mdc_method: 2
>
> gpg: encrypted with ELG key, ID 55572F4B
>
> gpg: encrypted with ELG key, ID 31743B64
>
> gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
It means they have not en
55572F4B
gpg: encrypted with ELG key, ID 31743B64
gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
After checking the error logs, I found that the public key in the above
mentioned log does not match our vendor's key number . So, I'm not sure if this
value changes in the process or encryption/decrypt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 06-07-2014 19:25, eMyListsDDg escribió:
>
> i found my error and the priv key. i had created this pair on a
> linux vm some time ago and had forgotten that. back then when i
> exported it and imported into a win machine something didn't quite
> t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 02-07-2014 0:45, eMyListsDDg escribió:
...
> well i managed to create a pub key without a priv key. that is, it
> only has a pub part. thats what gpa key manager is telling me.
That's not possible, since the public key is based on the secret
ke
> Am Di 01.07.2014, 09:29:57 schrieb eMyListsDDg:
>> somehow i managed to send a key id to a key server that has no
>> secret-key. so i would like to remove it.
>> gpg --output keyrevoke.asc --gen-revoke 0x
>> doesn't work since there is no secret key.
>>
> Am Di 01.07.2014, 09:29:57 schrieb eMyListsDDg:
>> somehow i managed to send a key id to a key server that has no
>> secret-key. so i would like to remove it.
>> gpg --output keyrevoke.asc --gen-revoke 0x
>> doesn't work since there is no secret key.
>>
Please don't reply to a message on the list and change the subject line.
Doing so causes your new topic to show "under" the previous one for
those using mail readers that thread properly, and may cause your
message to be missed altogether if someone has blocked that thread.
Instead, save the l
Am Di 01.07.2014, 09:29:57 schrieb eMyListsDDg:
> somehow i managed to send a key id to a key server that has no
> secret-key. so i would like to remove it.
>
> gpg --output keyrevoke.asc --gen-revoke 0x
>
> doesn't work since there is no secret key.
>
> at a lo
somehow i managed to send a key id to a key server that has no secret-key. so i
would like to remove it.
gpg --output keyrevoke.asc --gen-revoke 0x
doesn't work since there is no secret key.
at a loss as to how to remove/revoke this key
___
essage-
> From: Werner Koch [mailto:w...@gnupg.org]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 10:36 AM
> To: Steven Bonda
> Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> Subject: Re: No secret key on 1 file
>
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:56, sbo...@advance-medical.com said:
>
>> gpg: encrypted wi
16, 2013 10:36 AM
To: Steven Bonda
Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Subject: Re: No secret key on 1 file
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:56, sbo...@advance-medical.com said:
> gpg: encrypted with RSA key, ID 727A253D
> gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
Please check thenoutput of
gpg2 -v -K 727A253D
C:\Users\me>gpg2 -v -K 727A253D
gpg: using PGP trust model
gpg: error reading key: No secret key
C:\Users\me>gpg2 -v --edit-key 727A253D
gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.20; Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WA
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:56, sbo...@advance-medical.com said:
> gpg: encrypted with RSA key, ID 727A253D
> gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
Please check thenoutput of
gpg2 -v -K 727A253D
If you can't see the reason, you may want to
gpg2 -v --edit-key 727A253D
to see some m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/16/2013 07:56 AM, Steven Bonda wrote:
> --batch --passphrase
Have you tried to do this without --batch and --passphrase?
Is there any change?
- --
Larry Brower, CCNA
Fedora Ambassador - North America
Fedora Quality Assurance
lbro...@fe
Thanks for replying.
C:\Users\me>gpg2 --version
gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.20 (Gpg4win 2.1.1)
libgcrypt 1.5.2
C:\Users\me>Gpg2 -v --batch --passphrase pass -o c:\temp\temp.txt -d c:\
temp\temp.txt.pgp
gpg: public key is 727A253D
gpg: encrypted with RSA key, ID 727A253D
gpg: decryption failed: No secr
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 22:30, sbo...@advance-medical.com said:
> When I run the following command:
>
> Gpg2 -batch -passphrase pass -o c:\temp\temp.txt -d c:\temp\file.pgp
I assume you used
Gpg2 --batch --passphrase pass -o c:\temp\temp.txt -d c:\temp\file.pgp
That is two dashes for the long op
Hello,
I'm trying to decrypt a series of PGP files with GPG.
When I run the following command:
Gpg2 -batch -passphrase pass -o c:\temp\temp.txt -d c:\temp\file.pgp
I get the error:
gpg: encrypted with RSA key, ID 727A253D
gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
If I use PG
On Sat, 8 May 2010 21:14, please.p...@publicly.invalid said:
> for some time gpg2 from subversion has been giving me grief, claiming
> there was no secret key, while gpg1.xxx says there is:
This is the development version and you can't expect that it will work.
In particular we are
ubversion has been giving me grief, claiming
there was no secret key, while gpg1.xxx says there is:
highscreen [21:08] [/raidtest/CVS/gnupg] <# 44> g10/gpg2 --version
gpg (GnuPG) 2.1.0-svn5320
libgcrypt 1.5.0-svn1429
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL
o: GnuPG Users
Cc: David Gray
Subject: Re: No secret key under different account
David Gray wrote:
>
> What are peoples thoughts on which is the best option:
>
> a) copy the secring.gpg & pubring.gpg files to the second user account?
> b) export and import the keys to the
David Gray wrote:
> What are peoples thoughts on which is the best option:
I will stay out of this except to say options A and B are substantively
identical. Beyond that, this is a system administration question. I
know nothing of your system, and that means the best thing I can do is
to stay o
David Gray wrote:
>
> What are peoples thoughts on which is the best option:
>
> a) copy the secring.gpg & pubring.gpg files to the second user account?
> b) export and import the keys to the second user account?
> c) add a reference to the second account's gpg.conf file?
it depends on what
xample of the syntax for adding keyring
references to gpg.conf?
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org [mailto:gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org] On
Behalf Of John Clizbe
Sent: 30 October 2009 21:27
To: GnuPG Users
Subject: Re: No secret key under different accou
David Gray wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Thanks for the info, that makes sense.
>
> That does however mean that I will end up with two sets of keyring files,
> does anyone know a way to share them to certain priv'd users on a server.
Add the extra keyring(s) with 'keyring ' or
'secret-keyring ' line(s) in
t: 30 October 2009 14:43
To: David Gray
Subject: RE: No secret key under different account
Logon to the server as the account you wish to use to encrypt the files.
Import public key as you did prior and sign the key as you did prior.
This worked for me. I am not in my office, but there are 2 command
n run from a different account (SQLService) I get this
error.
gpg: encrypted with ELG key, ID 891AB7E7 gpg: decryption failed: No
secret
key
Error Decrypting C:\Program
Files\GNU\GnuPG\work\KLIOLB_20091002_11235900.PGP
I've given full permissions to the SQLService account.
Are
this error.
gpg: encrypted with ELG key, ID 891AB7E7 gpg: decryption failed: No secret
key
Error Decrypting C:\Program
Files\GNU\GnuPG\work\KLIOLB_20091002_11235900.PGP
I've given full permissions to the SQLService account.
Are there any permissions I need to set within GPG or do
effectively point to the server directory.
Thanks and best regards.
Gérard.
-Original Message-
From: Schrago, Gerard
Sent: mercredi, 29. avril 2009 17:24
To: 'gnupg-users@gnupg.org'
Subject: Help! Please with decryption failed: No secret key (gpg in batch mode)
Hi all,
ing: WARNING: message
> was not integrity protected.
> But if I have the running process invoking the very same script, the
> response is: gpg: encrypted with RSA key, ID 911633C3
> gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
> I have then tried to modify the script to define home directory usin
ypted with RSA key, ID 911633C3
gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
I have then tried to modify the script to define home directory
using --homedir and I got the following:
gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir `/home/superagt/'"
gpg: keyring `/home/superagt//secring.gpg' cr
g:
WARNING: message was not integrity protected.
But if I have the running process invoking the very same script, the response
is:
gpg: encrypted with RSA key, ID 911633C3
gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
I have then tried to modify the script to define home directory using --homedir
and I got the
On Friday 09 January 2009 07:02:52 Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:37, cpoll...@embarqmail.com said:
> > What would cause this to be displayed in the log? My secret key has been
> > imported and I can sign messages. After signing a message this error
> > disappears. Any idea what is cau
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:37, cpoll...@embarqmail.com said:
> What would cause this to be displayed in the log? My secret key has been
> imported and I can sign messages. After signing a message this error
> disappears. Any idea what is causing this?
There is a gpg-agent command HAVEKEY which is us
What would cause this to be displayed in the log? My secret key has been
imported and I can sign messages. After signing a message this error
disappears. Any idea what is causing this?
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
Mandriva Linux 2009, kernel 2.6.27-desktop-0.rc8.2mnb
signature.asc
Descr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Joe Demeny wrote:
> gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
>
> I'm wondering what the error "No secret key" means? Am I trying to decrypt
> the
> message with the wrong key? Or have I broken my gpg setup?
>
No
got:
...
>> I'm wondering what the error "No secret key" means? Am I trying to decrypt
>> the
>> message with the wrong key? Or have I broken my gpg setup?
>
>
> Key ID CF8503BE that was used to encrypt that message is the encryption
> subkey of:
.
:encrypted data packet:
> length: unknown
> gpg: encrypted with ELG key, ID CF8503BE
> gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
>
> I'm wondering what the error "No secret key" means? Am I trying to decrypt
> the
> message with the wrong key? Or have I broken my
D)
:pubkey enc packet: version 3, algo 16, keyid 72F9D3DCCF8503BE
data: [2046 bits]
data: [2048 bits]
gpg: armor header:
gpg: public key is CF8503BE
:encrypted data packet:
length: unknown
gpg: encrypted with ELG key, ID CF8503BE
gpg: decryption failed: No secret key
I&#
88 matches
Mail list logo
