On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:32:21AM +0930, Roscoe wrote:
> I imagine it's because stable is frozen. Hence only fixes will get in
> - and not new vewsions.
> (I maybe wrong on that.)
> (Naturally that only applies to stable..)
>
> Building and installing your own gnupg.deb from gnupg.org sources ha
Le Fri 9/09/2005, Roscoe disait
> I imagine it's because stable is frozen. Hence only fixes will get in
> - and not new vewsions.
> (I maybe wrong on that.)
> (Naturally that only applies to stable..)
But unsable still has 1.4.1
--
Erwan
___
Gnupg-us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roscoe wrote:
> I imagine it's because stable is frozen. Hence only fixes will get
> in - and not new vewsions. (I maybe wrong on that.) (Naturally that
> only applies to stable..)
>
> Building and installing your own gnupg.deb from gnupg.org sources
I imagine it's because stable is frozen. Hence only fixes will get in
- and not new vewsions.
(I maybe wrong on that.)
(Naturally that only applies to stable..)
Building and installing your own gnupg.deb from gnupg.org sources has
significant merits though.
(For those unfamilar its a three command
>>>>> "Oskar" == Oskar L
>>>>> "No Debian package for 1.4.2"
>>>>> Thu, 8 Sep 2005 20:26:10 +0300 (EEST)
Oskar> Does anyone know why there still isn't a Debian package for
Oskar> version 1.4.2 of GnuPG? http://
Does anyone know why there still isn't a Debian package for version 1.4.2
of GnuPG? http://packages.debian.org/gnupg
Oskar
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
