On Thu, 26 May 2005, Erpo wrote:
Cryptographic capabilities must be integrated into every popular OS and
application in such a way as to make it automatic and easy to encrypt
everything, no matter how mundane, from IMs to downloaded device
drivers. Once everyone is doing it, the people who rea
--- Shatadal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From
>
http://news.com.com/Minnesota+court+takes+dim+view+of
+encryption/2100-1030_3-5718978.html
>
> "A Minnesota appeals court has ruled that the
> presence of encryption software on a computer may be
> viewed as evidence of
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 16:11 -0500, Shatadal wrote:
> From
> http://news.com.com/Minnesota+court+takes+dim+view+of+encryption/2100-1030_3-5718978.html
>
> "A Minnesota appeals court has ruled that the presence of encryption
> software on a computer may be viewed as evidenc
So? Minnesota isn't undergoing the same nonsense as
the rest of the country? You underestimate your red
state colleagues' influence in ANY state.
--- Joseph Oreste Bruni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last time I checked, the President doesn't appoint
> judges in
> Minnesota, the Governor does.
Last time I checked, the President doesn't appoint judges in
Minnesota, the Governor does.
On May 25, 2005, at 3:40 PM, Robert Zagarello wrote:
What? You expect the age of enlightenment? You
forget who's President. Usually when the head stinks
the fish is not far behind.
What? You expect the age of enlightenment? You
forget who's President. Usually when the head stinks
the fish is not far behind.
BZAG
===
--- Shatadal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From
>
http://news.com.com/Minnesota+court+takes+dim+view+of+encry
From
http://news.com.com/Minnesota+court+takes+dim+view+of+encryption/2100-1030_3-5718978.html
"A Minnesota appeals court has ruled that the presence of encryption
software on a computer may be viewed as evidence of criminal intent."
___
G
