On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00, t...@pobox.com said:
> /usr/bin/gpg1 for users who want to keep using it. Dropping
> the keyserver and photoviewer helpers is part of the next
> planned release from the 1.4.x branch, which is being
> tracked in https://dev.gnupg.org/T3443.
Right. Given that gpg1 is a
On December 12, 2018 2:00:18 PM AKST, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
> the keyserver and photoviewer helpers
>
A permanent record and a mug shot for the cops and every thief, hooker, and
pickpocket on the block, respectively. And they all just help themselves to the
secret key.
Someone puts out a lit
Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I recently saw a message from one of Fedora's maintainers:
>
>> Coming soon to Fedora30 (rawhide), gnupg v1.4.x renamed to gnupg1. Also
>> dropping keyserver support at Werner's suggestion since upstream plans to
>> disable that soon.
On 12/12/2018 21:43, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz wrote:
>> Should I issue and publish a revocation certificate? Will this cause
>> problems considering that I'm still using the same master key?
>
> I don't think revocation is necessary if the private subkeys are still safe.
Yes, they are still safe. On
On 12.12.2018 22:35, Andrew Luke Nesbit wrote:
> My subkeys expired on Monday, 10/12/2018. I've updated my subkeys with
> a new expiration date (in one year). I'm considering NOT uploading the
> new public keys to the keyservers. Rather, I will distribute them using
> other channels, such as dow
On 12/12/2018 09:15, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> Coming soon to Fedora30 (rawhide), gnupg v1.4.x renamed to gnupg1. Also
>> dropping keyserver support at Werner's suggestion since upstream plans to
>> disable that soon.
>
> Source: https://infosec.exchange/@bcl/101195051788828
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 08:05:58 -0900, justina colmena via Gnupg-users wrote:
> One disadvantage of "keyservers" in general is that the automated queries to
> them leak "too much information" on the
> parties with whom one is communicating - even the fact that one is using PGP
> at all.
This can b
On December 12, 2018 2:35:43 AM AKST, Stefan Claas
wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 10:15:33 +0100, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via Gnupg-users
>wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I recently saw a message from one of Fedora's maintainers:
>>
>> > Coming soon to Fedora30 (rawhide), gnupg v1.4.x renamed to gnupg1.
>A
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 10:15:33 +0100, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I recently saw a message from one of Fedora's maintainers:
>
> > Coming soon to Fedora30 (rawhide), gnupg v1.4.x renamed to gnupg1. Also
> > dropping keyserver support at Werner's
> > suggestion since
Hello all,
I recently saw a message from one of Fedora's maintainers:
> Coming soon to Fedora30 (rawhide), gnupg v1.4.x renamed to gnupg1. Also
> dropping keyserver support at Werner's suggestion since upstream plans to
> disable that soon.
Source: https://infosec.exchange/@bcl/101195051788828
10 matches
Mail list logo