On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 15:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Actually, this is a very old discussion. I've come to accept that
> it's okay to choose the maximum, but I still don't buy that's the only
> choice. 8-)
Okay. We have have hard expiration dates on the todo list but nothing
you will see any t
* Werner Koch:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 13:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
>> Oh well, this is a bit counterintuitive because the expiration time is
>> a hard fact in X.509, and rather fuzzy in OpenPG.
>
> I don't agree that it is fuzzy in OpenPGP; it is well defined.
For v3 keys, it is, but not for v
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 13:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Oh well, this is a bit counterintuitive because the expiration time is
> a hard fact in X.509, and rather fuzzy in OpenPG.
I don't agree that it is fuzzy in OpenPGP; it is well defined. The fact
that you may change the expiration time does not
* Werner Koch:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 09:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
>> Is it possible to ignore the key expiration date during encryption?
>
> Not with gpg. With gpgsm you may try --debug-ignore-expiration.
Oh well, this is a bit counterintuitive because the expiration time is
a hard fact in X
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 09:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Is it possible to ignore the key expiration date during encryption?
Not with gpg. With gpgsm you may try --debug-ignore-expiration.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Auschnahme regelt ein Bundeschgesetz.
__
Is it possible to ignore the key expiration date during encryption?
Unfortunately, people tend to set expiration dates without thinking
about the consequences. It's not always possible to get a new
self-signature in a reasonable time frame.
--
Florian Weimer<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
B
