On 05-09-2016 0:45, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Do I smell a little bit of a Stockholm syndrome here?
>
> The Stockholm syndrome is half-pop science and half-real.
I know what it is. You have obviously worked too much with those forces
in law enforcement that prefer that citizens can't keep any s
On dissabte, 3 de setembre de 2016 21:05:28 CEST Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > Do you think that privacy is a fundamental human right?
>
> What does it mean for something to be a "fundamental" human right? If
> the question is meaningful, then there must be human rights that are
> *not* fundamental
> Do I smell a little bit of a Stockholm syndrome here?
The Stockholm syndrome is half-pop science and half-real. It stems from
a hostage situation in Stockholm where many of the hostages emotionally
bonded with their captors, and vice-versa, to the point where they
sympathized with each other.
On 04-09-2016 3:05, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Now, of course I don't want the civil authorities to have
> legislatively-mandated back doors into every system. I don't think
> that's an appropriate solution. But I do believe the civil authorities
> need appropriate mechanisms to pursue their lawf
> Reality is a *lot*
> more complicated than "the decision belongs to the people".
Yes, democracy is a mess. But "it belongs to the people" is a lot more
convenient than listing the complex, convoluted, and sometimes corrupt
machinery of government. :)
> Over here, police is knowingly ignoring
On 04/09/16 16:35, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Yes, it would be a mistake for policy to be determined by those who've been
> down in the mud with this crap. It would be deeply antidemocratic, in fact.
> This decision belongs to the people, not to an extremely small subset of the
> people with a (per
> And, with all due respect, for that reason I think policy should not be
> determined by people who have been exposed to a very unbalanced amount of
> horrible people. Constantly being confronted by the worst scum of the gutter
> skews your view of human behaviour.
There are two ways to interpret
On 04/09/16 03:05, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> I'm transitioning out of my job, where for the last eight years I've
> been doing research and development into digital forensics, mostly for
> government customers. After eight years I reached the point where I
> began to think that every adult male sh
> Do you think that privacy is a fundamental human right?
What does it mean for something to be a "fundamental" human right? If
the question is meaningful, then there must be human rights that are
*not* fundamental. So, what's a fundamental human right, and how is it
different from a normal huma
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 22:26:17 -0400
"Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
>
> Some serious questions --
>
> 1. Are you a privacy absolutist?
Robert, I have a counter-question:
Do you think that privacy is a fundamental human right?
Also, it seems to me a bit that the discussion following up your
10 matches
Mail list logo
