On Apr 26, 2009, at 9:13 PM, Allen Schultz wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Faramir wrote:
Hash: SHA256
How do I set my default hash again?
First, you'll need a signing key that will support the larger hash
size. I dropped my old DSA key in favor of RSA in order to do this.
The
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Faramir wrote:
Hash: SHA256
How do I set my default hash again?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-u
On Apr 24, 2009, at 3:07 PM, David Shaw wrote:
On Apr 24, 2009, at 12:40 PM, bkumfer wrote:
Thanks for your help. To create the key, I followed the
--gpg -gen-key command - used key length of 1024 bits.
I examined this key and there is nothing particularly unusual about
it. The only t
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:28:58 bkumfer wrote:
> Thank you again. Is there a difference between encrypting a file vs.
> encrypting an email?
Not really. It just bits n bytes. Anything gpg takes in as input (files,
plaintext, whatever) it just happily signs and/or encrypts. If you are
emailing the o
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 11:28 -0700, bkumfer wrote:
> Thank you again. Is there a difference between encrypting a file vs.
> encrypting an email?
Not really,... but with eMail,.. there mail be "additional" standards
used (PGP for MIME).
Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Apr 24, 2009, at 12:40 PM, bkumfer wrote:
Thanks for your help. To create the key, I followed the
--gpg -gen-key command - used key length of 1024 bits.
I examined this key and there is nothing particularly unusual about
it. The only thing that jumps out (and this is a reach) is that
bkumfer wrote:
> Thank you again. Is there a difference between encrypting a file vs.
> encrypting an email?
This depends on how you use it. From the perspective of OpenPGP,
everything's a file. An email message is just a file you send over the
internet via the SMTP protocol.
There is an enorm
-using-my-PGP-Public-key-tp22993706p23222432.html
Sent from the GnuPG - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
bkumfer escribió:
> Thanks for your help. To create the key, I followed the
>
> --gpg -gen-key command - used key length of 1024 bits.
I successfully sent an encrypted message to you, and the preferences
in your key looks "normal" to me...
Enc
04FUAhsMAAoJEMTEyDTjoX82i8EAoIG7I25x7NO5l7HLucwh01sK4+urAJ0bDSET
bJpyUoxBwOo87UJLIGZ8vg==
=pQMf
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Help-with-encrypting-using-my-PGP-Public-key-tp22993706p23220310.html
Sent from the GnuPG - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Apr 23, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Kumfer, Brian K wrote:
While I appreciate the response, please note that I am unfamiliar
with PGP and encryption, so this is my first attempt to work through
an issue surrounding the problem.
I never stated troubleshooting is a big burden. Rather, I did what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Kumfer, Brian K escribió:
> While I appreciate the response, please note that I am unfamiliar with PGP
> and encryption, so this is my first attempt to work through an issue
> surrounding the problem.
Well, maybe the problem is on their side, bu
they are using.
Any additional insight and help would be much appreciated.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Mearns [mailto:mearn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 11:05 AM
To: Kumfer, Brian K
Subject: Re: Help with encrypting using my PGP Public key
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:04 AM
To: GnuPG Users List
Subject: Re: Help with encrypting using my PGP Public key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
bkumfer wrote:
> Thanks for your reply - but that does not give me a solution or
answer. Is a
> key generated by GnuPG equivalent to another source created PGP key?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
bkumfer escribió:
> Thanks for your reply - but that does not give me a solution or answer. Is a
> key generated by GnuPG equivalent to another source created PGP key? I have
As long as all the programs are compilant with RFT4880, they should
be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
bkumfer wrote:
> Thanks for your reply - but that does not give me a solution or answer. Is a
> key generated by GnuPG equivalent to another source created PGP key? I have
> multiple banks I need to have a single key created for, so I cannot
> trou
message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Help-with-encrypting-using-my-PGP-Public-key-tp22993706p23197385.html
Sent from the GnuPG - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:56, brian.kum...@ggp.com said:
> file while using the gnupg tool. However, in working with the banks (the
> reason for the need), they tell me the key is causing the issue below - they
> will not necessarily use gnupg.
>
> Wed Apr 1 12:30:11 EDT 2009 Encrypt - complete fail
://www.nabble.com/Help-with-encrypting-using-my-PGP-Public-key-tp22993706p22993706.html
Sent from the GnuPG - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
19 matches
Mail list logo
