Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Stefan Claas wrote:
>
> > Due to a lenghtly discussion in Usenet, with native English speakers,
> > I decided againt an English version and will go instead for NATO/HEX,
> > which allows for faster and error free transfer via phone, radio, etc.
>
> Here is a
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > Let's assume the following...
>
> Let's not assume anything. You either have users in such conditions or
> you don't. Design for the users you do have, not the hypothetical users
> you imagine having. I can tell you from bitter experience, hypothetical
> users virtu
> Let's assume the following...
Let's not assume anything. You either have users in such conditions or
you don't. Design for the users you do have, not the hypothetical users
you imagine having. I can tell you from bitter experience, hypothetical
users virtually never appear in real life. The
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > I don't agree with you, because due to dialects spoken in every
> > country (even in the US) the PGP wordlist is not suitable IMHO
> > for non-native English speakers and international comms, which
> > the NATO alphabet is perfect for!
>
> It was designed by a computat
> I don't agree with you, because due to dialects spoken in every
> country (even in the US) the PGP wordlist is not suitable IMHO
> for non-native English speakers and international comms, which
> the NATO alphabet is perfect for!
It was designed by a computational linguist specifically to be res
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > Due to a lenghtly discussion in Usenet, with native English
> > speakers, I decided againt an English version and will go instead for
> > NATO/HEX, which allows for faster and error free transfer via phone,
> > radio, etc.
>
> You can do a *lot* better than that. This
> Due to a lenghtly discussion in Usenet, with native English
> speakers, I decided againt an English version and will go instead for
> NATO/HEX, which allows for faster and error free transfer via phone,
> radio, etc.
You can do a *lot* better than that. This is a solved problem.
https://en.wik
Stefan Claas wrote:
> Due to a lenghtly discussion in Usenet, with native English speakers,
> I decided againt an English version and will go instead for NATO/HEX,
> which allows for faster and error free transfer via phone, radio, etc.
Here is an output from a small encrypted NaCl secretbox blob
Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Ajax wrote:
>
> > Are there enough five letter words in the word lists available at
> > eff.org/dice?
>
> Thanks a lot! The short list has 782 five letter words, perfect!
>
> So I will then select 256 of them which are easy (for me) to
> read ... :-)
Due t
Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Ajax wrote:
>
> > Are there enough five letter words in the word lists available at
> > eff.org/dice?
>
> Thanks a lot! The short list has 782 five letter words, perfect!
>
> So I will then select 256 of them which are easy (for me) to
> read ... :-)
O.k.,
Ajax wrote:
> Are there enough five letter words in the word lists available at
> eff.org/dice?
Thanks a lot! The short list has 782 five letter words, perfect!
So I will then select 256 of them which are easy (for me) to
read ... :-)
Best regards
Stefan
--
box: 4a64758de9e8ceded2c481ee526440
Hi all,
I was wondering if native English speakers can help me out in finding 'the
right' 5 letter words which can be used in an binary to words encoder/decoder,
which then can be used with GnuPG encrypted binary files, so that these
(preferably small binary blobs) messages can then be send over t
12 matches
Mail list logo
