On 2016-10-10 at 23:48, MFPA wrote:
> I'm not sure what component in the package is a beta; GnuPG 2.1.15
> isn't and most of the version numbers match those in Gpg4win version
> 2.3.3 (2016-08-18).
>
I think it's mostly the GpgOl and GpgEx parts of the bundle that are in
beta, unless there's some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sunday 9 October 2016 at 11:53:10 PM, in
,
Schlacta, Christ wrote:-
> What we need is whomever maintains
> gpg4win to release a guide on how to have it utilize the system's
> install gnupg, so we can get 2.1.x working with some decent
> manage
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Saturday 8 October 2016 at 1:46:19 PM, in
,
Rohit P wrote:-
> Thanks.
> I downloaded the second item from the link you provided. It has no
> front-end and the readme file says it can be run only from
> command-line.
That's as it should be. W
6 3:54 PM
To: Rohit P on GnuPG-Users
Cc: Rohit P
Subject: Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Saturday 8 October 2016 at 8:02:00 AM, in
,
Rohit P wrote:-
> In Older versions of GnuPG, a system tray icon used to appear with
> an option to encrypt tex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Saturday 8 October 2016 at 8:02:00 AM, in
,
Rohit P wrote:-
> In Older versions of GnuPG, a system tray icon used to appear with
> an option to encrypt text on current window. Newer versions of GnuPG
> has no such option.
That would come from
In Older versions of GnuPG, a system tray icon used to appear with an option to
encrypt text on current window.
Newer versions of GnuPG has no such option.
I am not understanding the difference between GnuPG and GPG4Win. Are these one
and the same thing?
Windows binary is not available for
