> Nicholas Cole wrote:
> > Is there anything else about an HTML email that
> raises a red flag
> > from a security point of view?
>
> Define 'HTML email', please. If you're talking
> about simple XML, the
> security concerns are different than if you're
> talking about putting
> Javascript + Flas
On 10/17/06, Nicholas Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Ryan Malayter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again I must state that one has little to do with
> the other. MHTML's
> MIME format may not play nice with PGP/MIME's
> encapsultation format,
> but it didn't *have* to be that way. S/MIME, for
--- Ryan Malayter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again I must state that one has little to do with
> the other. MHTML's
> MIME format may not play nice with PGP/MIME's
> encapsultation format,
> but it didn't *have* to be that way. S/MIME, for
> example, seems to
> make provisions for playing nicel
> Of course that it doesn't mean that HTML should be
> banished completely
> from the 'lectronic mail world, but it has its
> essential limitations as
> for the cryptographic routines.
Mica,
Thank you for your email. It made me reflect. I had
been ignoring this discussion. HTML emails are here
On 10/16/06, Mica Mijatovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RFCs are not any "standards" nor they are by (their own) definition
supposed to be.
They are just collection of less or more recommended routines, and often
also nothing but the lists of (most usual/mass) _habits_.
Many RFCs *are* standar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Was Sun, 15 Oct 2006, at 22:27:36 -0500,
when Ryan wrote:
> On 10/14/06, Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anyway, HTML mails are evil.
> But unfortunately they're here to stay. RFC 2557 is now listed as
> "standards track".
RFCs a
On 10/14/06, Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyway, HTML mails are evil.
But unfortunately they're here to stay. RFC 2557 is now listed as
"standards track".
I used to rail against HTML mail myself, but all my reasoning was
soundly rebuffed by the CEO, CFO, my Mom, my sister, and reall
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:33, Ryan Malayter said:
> Does any other OpenPGP client handle this "attachment" result? Or do
This is actually the de-facto standard as used by PGP.
> you need to save the attachments and manually verify the detached
> signature? GPGOL itself doesn't seem to read this "ex
I will be out of the office on Friday October 13th. If you need immedate
assistance, please contact one of the following...
Kevin Klein: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (262) 834-0080 x203
Gary Maradik: [EMAIL PROTECTED] x201
Tim Kannenberg: [EMAIL PROTECTED] x207
Mike Giunta: [EMAIL PROTECTED] x202
Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Was Fri, 13 Oct 2006, at 23:36:43 -0400,
when John wrote:
> Alphax wrote:
>> PGP/MIME capable mail clients /may/ handle it, but you'd have to
>> actually try it to be certain. Such a test should be conducted off-list
>> in order to avoid fl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Alphax wrote:
> PGP/MIME capable mail clients /may/ handle it, but you'd have to
> actually try it to be certain. Such a test should be conducted off-list
> in order to avoid flames for an HTML posting.
I can't imagine anyone 'Flaming' an honest mi
Ryan Malayter wrote:
>>
>> HTML + OpenPGP = FAIL.
>>
>> In English: HTML screws up OpenPGP. You don't want it. There are other
>> reasons why you don't want HTML anyway but I won't go into them here.
>
>
> Actually, when I sign an HTML email with GPGOL, and send it to my
> Gmail account, I seem t
HTML + OpenPGP = FAIL.
In English: HTML screws up OpenPGP. You don't want it. There are other
reasons why you don't want HTML anyway but I won't go into them here.
Actually, when I sign an HTML email with GPGOL, and send it to my
Gmail account, I seem to get this on the receiving end:
1) A p
Cary Wagner wrote:
> When I try to digitally sign an email in Outlook, it changes my messages from
> HTML to Plain Text. The messages are starting out as HTML when I am typing,
> but I am guessing that as soon as I sign it, the message is being converted to
> text. Is there a way to correct this?
When I try to digitally sign an email in Outlook, it changes my messages from
HTML to Plain Text. The messages are starting out as HTML when I am typing,
but I am guessing that as soon as I sign it, the message is being converted to
text. Is there a way to correct this? Or, is the expected behav
15 matches
Mail list logo
