ing to https://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual/book1.html bug
> reports concerning the GNU Privacy Handbook should be sent to Mike
> Ashley (), however e-mails sent to that given address
> bounce, which is why I'm reporting here.
Yes, this is an outdated hint and I guess
there will be
On Sat, Jun 08, 2024 at 03:26:05AM +, Eric Pruitt via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 06:03:22PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users
> wrote:
> > Strictly, "their" is plural in English
>
> No, it is not. "They" and "their" have been used as gender-neutral,
> singular pronouns
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 11:47:08PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Few English-as-a-foreign-language courses should be expected to
> mention singular "they", so its use is inappropriate in documentation.
There are lots of things that aren't taught in classrooms that still
apply to
Eric Pruitt wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 06:03:22PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users wrote:
Strictly, "their" is plural in English
No, it is not. "They" and "their" have been used as gender-neutral,
singular pronouns for centuries. Even if that wasn't the case, it's
widely acce
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 06:03:22PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Strictly, "their" is plural in English
No, it is not. "They" and "their" have been used as gender-neutral,
singular pronouns for centuries. Even if that wasn't the case, it's
widely accepted in modern colloquial usa
Patrick F. Marques via Gnupg-users wrote:
Hi,
I was reading the gnupg documentation and although I’m not an English
native, I believe there is a “tiny” typo in this page
https://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual/x334.html
In the first paragraph:
(…) By personally checking the fingerprint you
, and since you have signed they key, (..)
I believe it should be “their key” instead of “they key”
Also, according to https://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual/book1.html bug
reports concerning the GNU Privacy Handbook should be sent to Mike
Ashley (), however e-mails sent to that given address
bounce
Hi,
https://www.gnupg.org/documentation/guides.html
The "The GNU Privacy Handbook" section.
Maybe add a warning that the work is somewhat outdated, as it's almost
20 years old.
Also, that section says:
"GPH is also available in the source repository."
I can't fi
On 05/02/16 12:01, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> IMO, the GPH needs to be taken down.
I agree. I was composing a mail on the subject when I started... eh... composing
a different mail on a different subject ;).
Peter.
--
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send
Looking over the GNU Privacy Handbook, it's clear it hasn't received any
maintenance in a decade or more. According to it, DSA is limited to
1024-bit keys, RSA gets almost no mention, SKS gets no mention, and
users are led to use the (closed-source, non-synchronizing) PGP
Corporation
10 matches
Mail list logo
