Re: Failed to use GPG key for SSH

2023-07-12 Thread Caleb Herbert
On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 13:55 +0300, Teemu Likonen wrote: > Secret keys are missing from this keyring, tells the "#" mark. Text > "sec#" means that the primary secret key is missing and "ssb#" tells > the > same about secret subkeys. Those should read as "sec" and "ssb", > without > the "#" mark, or

Re: Failed to use GPG key for SSH

2023-07-12 Thread Teemu Likonen
* 2023-07-11 22:28:36-0500, Caleb Herbert wrote: > But lately, I haven't been able to use SSH. > sec# rsa3072 2023-06-29 [SC] > 631CC434A56B5CBDFF21234697643795FA3E4BCE > uid [ultimate] Caleb Herbert > ssb# rsa3072 2023-06-29 [E] > ssb# rsa2048 2023-06-29 [A] Secret keys are

Re: Failed to use GPG key for SSH

2023-07-12 Thread Bernd Naumann
On 12.07.23 05:28, Caleb Herbert wrote: > [caleb@farnsworth ~]$ export SSH_AUTH_SOCK=$(gpgconf --list-dirs agent- > ssh-socket) > [caleb@farnsworth ~]$ gpgconf --launch gpg-agent > [caleb@farnsworth ~]$ ssh-add -L > The agent has no identities. > Hi Caleb, But you have the correct keygrip in `~/

Failed to use GPG key for SSH

2023-07-12 Thread Caleb Herbert
I've followed the guide at https://opensource.com/article/19/4/gpg-subkeys-ssh before, with success. But lately, I haven't been able to use SSH. I'll try to provide enough info below. OS: Fedora Silverblue 38 [caleb@farnsworth ~]$ gpg --list-secret-keys /var/home/caleb/.gnupg/pubring.kbx --