On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:03, gnupgpacker said:
> After further investigation about html mailing with Claws Mail:
> 'Dillo HTML viewer' project has been updated Jun-2015, not available for
> Windows.
Mature software does not always need updates. Nevertheless the plugin
code was recently updated to
El día martes, noviembre 24, 2020 a las 12:16:12a. m. +, Philihp Busby via
Gnupg-users escribió:
> As a personal policy, I do not respond to emails if they are only in HTML. It
> provides an excellent signal on when an email is actually worth the
> distraction. Even password-reset/verify-yo
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 01:23:39PM +0100, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 07:22, cqcallaw said:
>
> > At my job, I frequently send out summary charts and graphs surrounded by
> > text.
> > Attachments simply do not work; my audience cannot spend the mental energy
> >
As a personal policy, I do not respond to emails if they are only in HTML. It
provides an excellent signal on when an email is actually worth the
distraction. Even password-reset/verify-your-email emails will have text-only
components. Mailchimp marketing emails, on the other hand, often skip ov
ers
and its needs is necessary!
Best regards, Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Werner Koch
> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 1:30 PM
> ...
> Just load one of the HTML viewer plugins. Note that most plugins are
> an integral part of Claws and thus don't run into
On 23-11-2020 7:08, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> Since ages human read mails in ASCII or UTF-8 text. Why you think this
> is not a "human readable format"?
Sure, hand crafted html in a text reader is human readable. But the html
that is vomited by Outlook is not (unless you are a very experienced web
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 07:08:12AM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día lunes, noviembre 23, 2020 a las 03:03:54a. m. +0100, Johan Wevers
> escribió:
>
> > On 22-11-2020 12:38, Juergen Bruckner via Gnupg-users wrote:
> >
> > > I don't understand why HTML in e-Mails is so important for some peop
ns are an
integral part of Claws and thus don't run into problems like Enigmail
with Thunderbird.
Right, the first-use setup is not as easy as with Thunderbird. That is
the difference between a multi-million dollar per year project and a
voluntary thingy.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Geda
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 07:22, cqcallaw said:
> At my job, I frequently send out summary charts and graphs surrounded by text.
> Attachments simply do not work; my audience cannot spend the mental energy to
Proper MUAs display inline images without problems. I recall that even
exmh did this ~25 year
I'm sorry, but all this stuff becomes slightly off-topic
Am 23.11.2020 07:08, schrieb Matthias Apitz:
El día lunes, noviembre 23, 2020 a las 03:03:54a. m. +0100, Johan
Wevers escribió:
On 22-11-2020 12:38, Juergen Bruckner via Gnupg-users wrote:
> I don't understand why HTML in e-Mails is
El día lunes, noviembre 23, 2020 a las 07:22:19a. m. +, cqcallaw escribió:
> > Since ages human read mails in ASCII or UTF-8 text. Why you think this
> > is not a "human readable format"?
> >
> > HTML as e-mail (read carefully: as email, not as attachment) should be
> > forbidden because most
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, November 22, 2020 10:08 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día lunes, noviembre 23, 2020 a las 03:03:54a. m. +0100, Johan Wevers
> escribió:
>
> > On 22-11-2020 12:38, Juergen Bruckner via Gnupg-users wrote:
> >
> > > I don't understand why HTML in e-Mails
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 07:22:19 +
cqcallaw via Gnupg-users wrote:
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Sunday, November 22, 2020 10:08 PM, Matthias Apitz
> wrote:
>
> > El día lunes, noviembre 23, 2020 a las 03:03:54a. m. +0100, Johan Wevers
> > escribió:
> >
> > > On 22-11-2020 12:38, Ju
I don't know if this is the right place here, but as we are discussing about
sylpheed and claws-mail as well:
I have the following issue with Sylpheed:
I searched in Sylpheed for an email of April 20, 2020 for an insurance. I could
easily find it in Thunderbird, but Sylpheed couldn't find it. I
El día lunes, noviembre 23, 2020 a las 03:03:54a. m. +0100, Johan Wevers
escribió:
> On 22-11-2020 12:38, Juergen Bruckner via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
> > I don't understand why HTML in e-Mails is so important for some people.
>
> I agree on a personal level, but if you use your email also to
> co
On 22-11-2020 12:38, Juergen Bruckner via Gnupg-users wrote:
> I don't understand why HTML in e-Mails is so important for some people.
I agree on a personal level, but if you use your email also to
communicate with business users (usually using Outlook) it would be nice
to get their mails in a hu
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 16:17:37 +, Brad Rogers stated:
>True, but when my bank (just one example) tells me about their 'caring
>about security' and then spewing HTML left, right, and centre, whilst
>simultaneously disavowing themselves of blame should a virus be
>transported by their message, they
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 16:06:41 +
Andrew Gallagher wrote:
Hello Andrew,
>It is not always feasible to scold your correspondents about their use
>of HTML mail,
True, but when my bank (just one example) tells me about their 'caring
about security' and then spewing HTML left, right, and centre,
> On 22 Nov 2020, at 11:40, Juergen Bruckner via Gnupg-users
> wrote:
>
> HTML in e-Mails is a very big security risk in my eyes.
Not just yours, but unfortunately for many people it is a risk that they must
absorb, because e.g. their job may depend upon it. It is not always feasible to
sco
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 12:38:52PM +0100, Juergen Bruckner via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>
> I don't understand why HTML in e-Mails is so important for some people.
>
> For example, I configured my Mailserver to sort out HTML-Mails as Spam as
> long the sender is not on a whitelist.
> HTML in e-Mails i
Hi Chris,
Am 22.11.20 um 10:02 schrieb gnupgpacker:
Claws Mail is an useful alternative, but please keep aware it does not
support html mail, text only!
https://www.claws-mail.org/manual/de/claws-mail-manual.html#AEN955
Best regards, Chris
I don't understand why HTML in e-Mails is so import
upg-users
> Subject: Re: Thunderbird / Enigmail / Autocrypt
> Message-ID: <87sg92lhae@wheatstone.g10code.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> ...
> Checkout Claws-mail which was forked from Sylpheed many years ago.
> The
> OpenPGP and S/MIME integrati
The
> OpenPGP and S/MIME integration of both was initially done by me but many
> others improved it at lot. Claws is like Thunderbird cross-platform.
>
> The current TB OpenPGP support is pretty basic after they removed
> Enigmail.
>
>
> Salam-Shalom,
>
>Werner
&g
ion of both was initially done by me but many
others improved it at lot. Claws is like Thunderbird cross-platform.
The current TB OpenPGP support is pretty basic after they removed
Enigmail.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
signatu
If you think about using the current stable version of Thunderbird
(version 78), then there is no Enigmail and no Autocrypt. OpenPGP has
been implemented directly in Thunderbird, but there is currently no
Autocrypt support in Thunderbird.
-Patrick
Daniel Bossert via Gnupg-users wrote on
Hello all
How secure is it to use Thundebrird with Autocrypt? I use Sylpheed at the
moment, but it is not that comfortable to use as Thunderbird.
Also, when I send an email, the signature will be shown instead like with
thunderbid just an info that the mail is signed
Do you have some inputs?
R
"Hernâni Marques (p≡p foundation)" wrote:
> On 08.10.19 18:37, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
>
>> Pity, but I hope it will be better that way. In particular I hope, that
>> Mozilla will not follow your example and won’t entice users to proprietary
>> isolated keyserver [0] instead of distributed SKS
On 08.10.19 18:37, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
> Pity, but I hope it will be better that way. In particular I hope, that
> Mozilla will not follow your example and won’t entice users to proprietary
> isolated keyserver [0] instead of distributed SKS network thus splitting the
> keybase. And won’
Andrew Gallagher:
> On 31/07/2019 13:36, David wrote:
>> Enigmail always defaults to the first set of keys one created
>
> Enigmail will default to the first set of keys in your keyring that
> matches the selection criteria. Do you have more than one ID on each
> key? Do y
On 31.07.2019 14:26, David wrote:
> Consider the fact that for 30 times Enigmail refused to accept the
> passphrase for da...@gbenet.com
>
> I decided to send an encrypted email to Erich. When selecting his
> private key there was no automatic tick in postmaster. But a tick in
&
* da...@gbenet.com:
> People say "Oh your settings are wrong" But the FAIL to give the RIGHT
> SETTINGS!! And then go waffling on
People don't fail you. Your entitlement issues do. Falsely stating
software X cannot do Y when you are not using it right, expecting
answers on a s
On 31/07/2019 13:36, David wrote:
> Enigmail always defaults to the first set of keys one created
Enigmail will default to the first set of keys in your keyring that
matches the selection criteria. Do you have more than one ID on each
key? Do you have more than one key for each ID? This could
t;
>> I sent an encrypted and signed email to site-admin from postmaster. I
>> received the email - it took 6 attempts to decrypt it.
>>
>> I then decided to reply - so I sent an encrypted and signed email to
>> postmaster - I was unable to sign as site-admin - after
Patrick Brunschwig:
> On 31.07.2019 08:56, David wrote:
>> Patrick Brunschwig:
>>> On 31.07.2019 00:36, David wrote:
>>>> Andrew Gallagher:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 30 Jul 2019, at 18:47, David wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>&
site-admin from postmaster. I
> received the email - it took 6 attempts to decrypt it.
>
> I then decided to reply - so I sent an encrypted and signed email to
> postmaster - I was unable to sign as site-admin - after 9 attempts of
> entering the passphrase - each time rejected by E
David:
> Erich Eckner via Gnupg-users:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> here is, how I had thunderbird + enigmail running for several years with
>> two keys and without problems (I have switched away from thunderbird
>> since one year ago, because it got too heavy and slow for
On 31.07.2019 08:56, David wrote:
> Patrick Brunschwig:
>> On 31.07.2019 00:36, David wrote:
>>> Andrew Gallagher:
>>>>
>>>>> On 30 Jul 2019, at 18:47, David wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello Stefan,
>>>>>
>>
Erich Eckner via Gnupg-users:
> Hi David,
>
> here is, how I had thunderbird + enigmail running for several years with
> two keys and without problems (I have switched away from thunderbird
> since one year ago, because it got too heavy and slow for my taste):
>
> For ea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi David,
here is, how I had thunderbird + enigmail running for several years with
two keys and without problems (I have switched away from thunderbird since
one year ago, because it got too heavy and slow for my taste):
For each sending
Robert J. Hansen:
>> That's why I am considering other solutions. I have been with
>> Thunderbird and Enigmail for over 20 years with one key pair -
>
> This is simply not possible, as Enigmail didn't exist until 2001. (It
> took until about 2003
Patrick Brunschwig:
> On 31.07.2019 00:36, David wrote:
>> Andrew Gallagher:
>>>
>>>> On 30 Jul 2019, at 18:47, David wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Stefan,
>>>>
>>>> I have three email accounts with their own keys
On 31.07.2019 00:36, David wrote:
> Andrew Gallagher:
>>
>>> On 30 Jul 2019, at 18:47, David wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Stefan,
>>>
>>> I have three email accounts with their own keys - Enigmail does not
>>> support this - you have to ha
> That's why I am considering other solutions. I have been with
> Thunderbird and Enigmail for over 20 years with one key pair -
This is simply not possible, as Enigmail didn't exist until 2001. (It
took until about 2003 before it beca
Ralph Seichter:
> * da...@gbenet.com:
>
>> Enigmail will only work with ONE Key.
>> It does not recognise any other key than the first key that was
>> created.
>
> I use multiple keys with Enigmail and Thunderbird, and I have done so
> for years.
>
>
Andrew Gallagher:
>
>> On 30 Jul 2019, at 18:47, David wrote:
>>
>> Hello Stefan,
>>
>> I have three email accounts with their own keys - Enigmail does not
>> support this - you have to have one key and that's it.
>
> That is simply not true. I
* da...@gbenet.com:
> Enigmail will only work with ONE Key.
> It does not recognise any other key than the first key that was
> created.
I use multiple keys with Enigmail and Thunderbird, and I have done so
for years.
> You don't think perhaps can not think - your not too
Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users:
> David wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
>> I have three email accounts with their own keys - Enigmail does not
>> support this - you have to have one key and that's it.
>
> Ah, o.k. I never tried it, but it should be possible, with diffe
Ralph Seichter:
> * da...@gbenet.com:
>
>> I have three email accounts with their own keys - Enigmail does not
>> support this - you have to have one key and that's it.
>
> Nonsense! One can not only configure one PGP key per account (of which
> there can be many)
* da...@gbenet.com:
> I have three email accounts with their own keys - Enigmail does not
> support this - you have to have one key and that's it.
Nonsense! One can not only configure one PGP key per account (of which
there can be many), one can even configure one key per identi
> On 30 Jul 2019, at 18:47, David wrote:
>
> Hello Stefan,
>
> I have three email accounts with their own keys - Enigmail does not
> support this - you have to have one key and that's it.
That is simply not true. I used enigmail with multiple keys for years without
David wrote:
Hi David,
> I have three email accounts with their own keys - Enigmail does not
> support this - you have to have one key and that's it.
Ah, o.k. I never tried it, but it should be possible, with different
accounts and keys (hopefully).
> Am downloading and install
Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users:
> David wrote:
>
>> Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users:
>>> David wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I am looking for an alternative to Enigmail - which fails to work.
>>>> Any ideas as
David wrote:
> Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users:
> > David wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Everyone,
> >>
> >> I am looking for an alternative to Enigmail - which fails to work.
> >> Any ideas as to a suitable replacement??
> >
> > You may ch
Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users:
> David wrote:
>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> I am looking for an alternative to Enigmail - which fails to work.
>> Any ideas as to a suitable replacement??
>
> You may check out another MUA, like Claws-Mail, which I used with
> G
David wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I am looking for an alternative to Enigmail - which fails to work.
> Any ideas as to a suitable replacement??
You may check out another MUA, like Claws-Mail, which I used with
GPG plug-ins in the past. It worked fine!
Regards
Ste
Hello Everyone,
I am looking for an alternative to Enigmail - which fails to work.
Any ideas as to a suitable replacement??
Regards
David
--
People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Government - Their Government
Should Be Afraid Of The People - When Injustice Becomes Law, REBELLION
Becomes A DUTY
der no
> circumstances want to work in terminal or commandline interface.
>
> And i could reproduce this error/failure on another Raspi too.
oh, o.k. i thought that it is only for personal usage.
Well, in that case hopefully the Enigmail team can give you an answer!
Regards
Stefan
--
h
reproduce this error/failure on another Raspi too.
regards
Juergen
Am 18.11.18 um 15:34 schrieb Stefan Claas:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 14:52:14 +0100, Juergen Bruckner wrote:
>> Hello Groups,
>>
>> I do this as crossposting on gnupg and enigmail - lists.
>>
On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 14:52:14 +0100, Juergen Bruckner wrote:
> Hello Groups,
>
> I do this as crossposting on gnupg and enigmail - lists.
>
> Raspian: November 2018 (Kernel 4.4)
> Thunderbird: 52.9.1 - 32bit
> Enigmail 2.0.8 (20180804-1515)
> all installed from the Rasp
Hello Groups,
I do this as crossposting on gnupg and enigmail - lists.
Raspian: November 2018 (Kernel 4.4)
Thunderbird: 52.9.1 - 32bit
Enigmail 2.0.8 (20180804-1515)
all installed from the Raspbian-sources
At the moment I try to etablish a "Backup-Mail-Client" on a RaspberryPi
with T
thank you for being patient with super noobs like me
hope you will find some time to build those packages
in the meantime I'll keep on learning GnuPG
by the way distro-packaged 2.1.11 in /usr/bin/gpg2 and freshly compiled
2.2.4 in /usr/local/bin/gpg live peacefully together on my ubuntu 16.04
machi
27;t break it any further anyway. And 2.1.11 has known bugs
and deficiencies, and the fixes have not been backported by Ubuntu. It
seems nothing but a win to replace it with 2.2.
Peter.
--
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if y
nd
> another one in /usr/local. The one in /usr might interfere with what you
> intend with the one in /usr/local. But you can't just deinstall the
> Ubuntu packages, because stuff depends on it. It would force
> deinstallation of all packages depending upon gnupg2, gpg-agent etcetera
27;t install anything
in /usr, so there will no longer be a /usr/bin/gpg2 at all. But any
package that depends on "gnupg2" will see the empty equivs package named
"gnupg2" and be happy that it is installed.
I have done this myself with other packages, but never with GnuPG.
>
e)
what a rewarding side effect of unwittingly breaking the housekeeping rules)
seriously now ...
it was a fresh ubuntu 16.04 install
it came with gnupg 1.4.20 and 2.1.11
i compiled gnupg 2.2.4
it worked just fine in terminal and after configuring Enigmail with the
new gpg location works there as we
g Debian stable. For once, that
means I'm running a newer version than others! :-D
Peter.
--
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
My key is available at <
On 22/02/18 18:10, Dmitry Gudkov wrote:
> problem solved by configuring Enigmail to use the new gnupg location in
> /usr/local/bin/gpg (in the "Preferences" dialog, "Basic" tab, override
> the default setting /usr/bin/gpg2)
While my mind was idly mulling this over, I
dear all,
thank you for your time and help
problem solved by configuring Enigmail to use the new gnupg location in
/usr/local/bin/gpg (in the "Preferences" dialog, "Basic" tab, override
the default setting /usr/bin/gpg2)
Dmitry
On 22.02.2018 19:14, Damien Goutte-Gattat wr
Hi,
On 02/22/2018 02:21 PM, Dmitry Gudkov wrote:
sudo make -f build-aux/speedo.mk INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local
[...]
*and all works fine in terminal*
however after installing Enigmail I get this error
You installed GnuPG 2.2.4 in /usr/local, but you still have an older
version in /usr
. Then again, mixing
these versions with identical homedirs is tested and has failed the test, so I'm
hoping for a net improvement ;-).
HTH,
Peter.
--
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
My key is a
ncompressed, ZIP, ZLIB, BZIP2
*then I imported my existing keys for the other machine*
*and all works fine in terminal*
however after installing Enigmail I get this error when I try to attach
my public key to the message
thank you for your time to this matter
Dmitry
On 22.02.2018 16:19, W
Hi!
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 11:04, bere...@hotmail.com said:
> gpg: skipped packet of type 12 in keybox
Are you sure this if gpg 2.2.4 ? The error looks more like this is a
gpg version < 2.1.20.
Type 12 are ring trust packets which are used internally by gpg. The
code which shows this error is
dear all,
when trying to use enigmail with latest gpg 2.2.4 I get the following error:
Error - key extraction command failed
/usr/bin/gpg2 --charset utf-8 --display-charset utf-8 --use-agent
--batch --no-tty --status-fd 2 -a --export 0xFB417E72
gpg: skipped packet of type 12 in keybox
gpg
any suggestions to complete apparmor rules to enable all functionality
for a /usr/local gpg install with thunderbird/gpg/enigmail ?
currently appended rules below to the default thunderbird profile allow
mostly all functionality except i cannot enable the commented out rules
otherwise enigmail
Am 26.07.2017 um 14:05 schrieb dekkz...@gmail.com:
> On 07/26, Andreas Heinlein wrote:
>> Am 26.07.2017 um 11:27 schrieb MFPA:
>>> Do "most normal users" make use of an OpenPGP smartcard? Those that do
>>> might be able to use the same keypair on their mobile phone by means
>>> of an NFC-enabled sm
On 07/26, Andreas Heinlein wrote:
Am 26.07.2017 um 11:27 schrieb MFPA:
Do "most normal users" make use of an OpenPGP smartcard? Those that do
might be able to use the same keypair on their mobile phone by means
of an NFC-enabled smartcard.
Surely not. I guess most "normal users" don't even know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wednesday 26 July 2017 at 12:27:20 PM, in
, Andreas Heinlein
wrote:-
> Besides that, AFAIK the NFC-functionality on several
> SmartCards is not
> for use with OpenPGP, it's just there for additional
> purposes with other
> applications.
At l
Am 26.07.2017 um 11:27 schrieb MFPA:
> Do "most normal users" make use of an OpenPGP smartcard? Those that do
> might be able to use the same keypair on their mobile phone by means
> of an NFC-enabled smartcard.
Surely not. I guess most "normal users" don't even know that such a
thing exists.
Besi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tuesday 25 July 2017 at 9:49:15 PM, in
, Andreas Heinlein
wrote:-
> I still would not recommend that to non-technical
> people. While the
> users on this list probably know what a 'decent'
> passphrase is, most
> normal users don't. They tend
generated keypair on enigmail/thunderbird
and iOS Mail
Since its release, Canary Mail is probably your best option, since it support
OpenPGP out-of-the-box.
If you rather prefer to keep using iOS Mail, you’ll have to resort to the much
less than user friendly options oPenGP and iPGMail (as others have
very passionate about cyber security and working against mass
> surveillance. I therefore try to stay informed about security
> measurements and encryption.
>
> Nevertheless, I do have a problem which I cannot solve by myself.
>
> I generated a keypair using enigmail on thunder
Am 25.07.2017 um 20:34 schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
>> I would think you could transfer the private key file to the moblle
>> device by bluetooth, or by using a USB cable, or by email. So long as
>> the private key is protected by a decent passphrase, anybody else
>> getting a copy of the file should
> I would think you could transfer the private key file to the moblle
> device by bluetooth, or by using a USB cable, or by email. So long as
> the private key is protected by a decent passphrase, anybody else
> getting a copy of the file should be of no consequence.
This is correct.
I've often v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Friday 14 July 2017 at 7:48:59 PM, in
, E.Keen wrote:-
> However, I don't know how to transfer the private key
> securely without
> anyone else being able to obtain it.
I would think you could transfer the private key file to the moblle
devic
. You still need to press "send" a
second time, but you don't have to mess around with clipboards.
The disadvantage is that sending encrypted messages as attachments is
not standards compliant, and enigmail for one has great trouble dealing
with them at the other end. Unfortunately t
As said by Fabian, IOS natively only supports S/ MIME keys. This works rather
seamlessly. You nearly do not notice it. However to exchange or DELETE outdated
S/MIME certificates of others is a real pain and made me stop working with it.
The IOS apps for working with openpg encryption are iPGMail
which I cannot solve by myself.
>
> I generated a keypair using enigmail on thunderbird for this email address.
> Now, I'd like to use the same address with the same encryption keys on
> an iOS device.
> However, I don't know how to transfer the private key securely
Dear community,
I am very passionate about cyber security and working against mass
surveillance. I therefore try to stay informed about security
measurements and encryption.
Nevertheless, I do have a problem which I cannot solve by myself.
I generated a keypair using enigmail on thunderbird
On July 14, 2017 6:52:56 AM CDT, "E.Keen" wrote:
>
Don't encrypt your message to the mailing list.
--
Thanks.
Fabian S.
OpenPGP:
3c3fa072accb7ac5db0f723455502b0eeb9070fc
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mail
binPfBxCmaV17.bin
Description: PGP/MIME version identification
encrypted.asc
Description: OpenPGP encrypted message
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ld also add "or that somebody
managed to compute the private key for the key that signed this message".
Cheers,
Peter.
--
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
My key is available at <http://digital
f the unpacked binaries too,
on their download page. Should one hash discrepancy show
up on my computer i could try another one and see if the hash
matches then.
>
> And so I come to my other comment, in reply to:
>
>> So what i have learned from this whole
>> thread, also abou
come to my other comment, in reply to:
> So what i have learned from this whole
> thread, also about my proposal for identicons, i should buy me
> an offline computer, send Thunderbird/Enigmail to /dev/null
> and transfer signed/encrypted messages from my online usage
> comput
Am 12.06.2017 um 23:50 schrieb Duane Whitty:
Thanks for your input much appreciated!
I would also add one word about USB sticks: It is very difficult to
know if they've been compromised and there are no tell-tale signs when
an attack is taking place. I never put a USB in my computer that has
On 17-06-12 05:45 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> On 12.06.17 22:35, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>>> Is there something like a Standard Operating Procedure for GnuPG
>>> available, which fulfills security experts demands, and which can
>>> easily be adapted by an average GnuPG user, regardless of platform
On 12.06.17 22:35, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Is there something like a Standard Operating Procedure for GnuPG
>> available, which fulfills security experts demands, and which can
>> easily be adapted by an average GnuPG user, regardless of platform
>> and client he/she uses?
> No. More to the po
> Is there something like a Standard Operating Procedure for GnuPG
> available, which fulfills security experts demands, and which can
> easily be adapted by an average GnuPG user, regardless of platform
> and client he/she uses?
No. More to the point, there can't be. Each user faces threats
sp
On 12.06.17 22:10, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> and transfer signed/encrypted messages from my online usage
>> computer with a USB stick to my offline computer and verify
>> decrypt the messages there. :-)
> If you think your online computer may be compromised, then you have no
> business sharing USB
> and transfer signed/encrypted messages from my online usage
> computer with a USB stick to my offline computer and verify
> decrypt the messages there. :-)
If you think your online computer may be compromised, then you have no
business sharing USB devices between it and your believed-safe comput
On 12.06.17 21:15, Peter Lebbing wrote:
>> (Remember there are two types of companies. Those who know they got
>> hacked and those who don't know yet that they got hacked.)
>>
>>
I should put that as a signature in my email and Usenet client! :-)
Regards
Stefan
1 - 100 of 359 matches
Mail list logo
