Rewards program might be an interesting way to allow
> GnuPG to accept small concurrency donations.
>
> There may be some legal reasons, or non profit status constraints that
> might prevent these organizations from accepting donations through
> Smile or Brave, but I thought I would go
concurrency donations.
There may be some legal reasons, or non profit status constraints that
might prevent these organizations from accepting donations through
Smile or Brave, but I thought I would go ahead and make the suggestion
on the chance that it simply hadn't been considered yet.
Amazon
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:40, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
> While I think it's a good idea to include an alias, I think you should
> do that consistently for all the menus, otherwise "Documentation" and
> "Related software" are going to end up even more hidden ;).
Frankly, I think we should change
On 10.12.2015 18:49, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> ... So, yeah. I'm thinking this is not a credible source for
> fundraising. Arduino and GNOME, projects with *far* greater visibility,
> get $0 a month from Bountysource. I find it hard to believe we'd do
> much better.
>
> I think this is somethin
On 10/12/15 20:53, Werner Koch wrote:
> I just modified it to put an submenu item as an alias there. Is that
> better?
While I think it's a good idea to include an alias, I think you should
do that consistently for all the menus, otherwise "Documentation" and
"Related software" are going to end u
I just modified it to put an submenu item as an
alias there. Is that better?
> - subj enables recurring donations (personally I am not willing to make
> large one-time transcation),
I know. It is quite some work to do that properly because it needs some
kind of account manegment to match t
> You just said it's a place where people eager to give go to find whom to
> give... but now you're saying that it's new. If it's new, that means
> they're still beginning to attract users and build their own reputation.
> So which is it? Is it a place with a lot of users and a reputation for
>
> Wow, actual Donate page turned out to be a secret area, not obvious to
> get to it (it looks like a menu header, not a menu entry).
Then that's a problem we should look into, and thanks for telling us
about it. :)
> - subj enables recurring donations (personally I am not w
s fix it, but I'm not sure it's a good idea to change
> something that works.
Wow, actual Donate page turned out to be a secret area, not obvious to
get to it (it looks like a menu header, not a menu entry).
Without regard to that:
- subj enables recurring donations (personally I am no
> This request targets GnuPG maintainers to register a team on that
> (and/or others, e.g. Gratipay) croudfunding platform.
Is there some problem with the existing donation system? If there's a
problem then let's fix it, but I'm not sure it's a good idea to change
something that works.
signatu
This request targets GnuPG maintainers to register a team on that
(and/or others, e.g. Gratipay) croudfunding platform.
GnuPG users are welcome to comment whether they would support such
opportunity.
Occasional GnuPG contributors are welcome to comment whether they would
like to become "bounty hunt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thorsten Haude wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Werner Koch wrote (2007-01-05 14:58):
>> Shall we start to measure contributions by the number of source code
>> lines [...]?
>
> That;
> would;
> be;
> a;
> really;
> good;
> idea!;
>
I can see you are making a poi
Hi,
* Werner Koch wrote (2007-01-05 14:58):
>Shall we start to measure contributions by the number of source code
>lines [...]?
That;
would;
be;
a;
really;
good;
idea!;
Thorsten
--
War is God's Way to teach geography to Americans.
pgpHziGbYDvBu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Was Fri, 05 Jan 2007, at 08:17:26 -0500,
when Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Matthias Kirschner wrote:
>> But considering your motivation ("grateful [... to] have a Free
>> Software implementation of the OpenPGP protocol.") you donated your
>> m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Was Fri, 05 Jan 2007, at 14:58:26 +0100,
when Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> But considering your motivation ("grateful [... to] have a Free Software
>> implementation of the OpenPGP protocol.") y
my company, we prefer to get commercial requests for
support, enhancements or other services instead of Chrismas donations.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> If I'm wrong, I invite people to say so, so that I may be corrected. If
> I'm right, I invite people to say so, so that you may be corrected.
I believe I understood your motivation in advocating Donation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Matthias Kirschner wrote:
> But considering your motivation ("grateful [... to] have a Free Software
> implementation of the OpenPGP protocol.") you donated your money to the
> "wrong" address. IMHO you should have donated to GnuPG directly, give it
Dear Robert,
long time since you wrote this, but I did not have time to reply
earlier.
* Robert J. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-05 16:06:56 -0600]:
[...]
> This year, I'm grateful that we have a Free Software implementation of
> the OpenPGP protocol. I'm also grateful that the developm
19 matches
Mail list logo
