On 06/27/2013 09:24 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> Some of the discussion in this bug seems relevant to the GnuPG and
> GnuPG2 packages in Debian, but the bug is against the archive
> pseudo-package:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612657
I wouldn't classify it as a bug but I did
Some of the discussion in this bug seems relevant to the GnuPG and
GnuPG2 packages in Debian, but the bug is against the archive
pseudo-package:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612657
Can anybody else make any comments:
a) should there be more effort to phase out SHA1?
b) how i
