On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:16, s...@pobox.com said:
> is there a --status-fd flag, there is a --logger-fd flag. I
> don't know what the difference between emitting a status message
--status-fd N gives the file descriptor to write status messages like
[GNUPG:] GOODSIG 53B620D01CE0C630 Werner Koch
> > Reading through old posts I saw various recommendations to
> > use status-fd, status-file or to redirect stderr to stdout
> > and use grep -v to eliminate those lines. The status-fd
> > and status-file flags don't work as far as I can tell
>
> No ideas on how to suppress the "good signat
> Reading through old posts I saw various recommendations to
> use status-fd, status-file or to redirect stderr to stdout
> and use grep -v to eliminate those lines. The status-fd
> and status-file flags don't work as far as I can tell
No ideas on how to suppress the "good signature" output
I run gpg as part of a shell script which runs from cron.
I would like to suppress or redirect messages which are
"status good" and only emit messages to stderr which
suggest there was a problem with the script. (I get
enough mail as it is.) I have so far been unable to
suppress the "good signatu
