On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:42, David SMITH said:
> Does anyone have any more details on exactly *what* is "broken" on the
> pks keyservers? I'm going to have to convince our IT department that it's
PKS does not support OpenPGP. What it does is just a hack to support
one subkey but no full merging c
David SMITH wrote:
> Does anyone have any more details on exactly *what* is "broken" on the
> pks keyservers? I'm going to have to convince our IT department that it's
> the keyserver that's broken, and not my key (since no-one else has the
> problem, as they all use single subkeys), and I think
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 07:26:24PM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:10, David SMITH said:
> > I'm having some problems with my GnuPG-generated key. I have one
> > primary DSA for signing (which does not expire), and then every 6 months
> > I generate a new El-Gamal encryption key
John Clizbe wrote:
> John W. Moore III wrote:
>> I'd recommend hkp://blackhole.pca.dfn.de
>
> I wouldn't, and it has nothing to do with the server choice.
Well, I would not be so harsh. I guess there are
pretty well connected servers (concerning bandwidth
and reliability of network lines) and n
John Clizbe wrote:
>>I'd recommend hkp://blackhole.pca.dfn.de
The that server has always been a good choice,
since it is maintained by Germany`s National
Research and Education Network and their people
are payed to keep the Service running ;-)
So I would second that recommendation for users
in G
John W. Moore III wrote:
> Bjoern Buerger wrote:
>> Michael Kallas wrote:
>>> hkp://subkeys.pgp.net or hkp://sks.keyserver.penguin.de ?
>
>> Sorry, the latter is down at the moment. But you can
>> try hkp://random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de instead,
>> which is a collection of public sks keyservers.
Michael Kallas wrote:
> hkp://subkeys.pgp.net or hkp://sks.keyserver.penguin.de ?
Sorry, the latter is down at the moment. But you can
try hkp://random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de instead,
which is a collection of public sks keyservers. All
of them treat subkeys in a safe way.
Greetings,
Bjørn
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Bjoern Buerger wrote:
> Michael Kallas wrote:
>> hkp://subkeys.pgp.net or hkp://sks.keyserver.penguin.de ?
>
> Sorry, the latter is down at the moment. But you can
> try hkp://random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de instead,
> which is a collection of publi
Hi,
David SMITH schrieb:
> Now, when I upload my public key to a keyserver it all appears to go OK,
> but when someone else then tries to download my key, the sub-key is
> missing/doesn't work.
Have you ever tried
hkp://subkeys.pgp.net or hkp://sks.keyserver.penguin.de ?
Broken keyservers have se
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:10, David SMITH said:
> I'm having some problems with my GnuPG-generated key. I have one
> primary DSA for signing (which does not expire), and then every 6 months
> I generate a new El-Gamal encryption key (which expires after 6 months).
That is fine. Many folks do it li
Hi all,
I'm having some problems with my GnuPG-generated key. I have one
primary DSA for signing (which does not expire), and then every 6 months
I generate a new El-Gamal encryption key (which expires after 6 months).
Now, when I upload my public key to a keyserver it all appears to go OK,
but
11 matches
Mail list logo