Is 'Стефан Васильев ' the same person that
was ban from this very list a fiew month back?
No, because no one was ever banned. One user, also named Stefan, was
set to moderation (his messages had to be approved by an admin before
appearing on list), but this was only for two weeks, and he was ne
Brandon Anderson wrote:
On 14 Jul 2021, at 23:52, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users
wrote:
It would tell me as 3rd party that for WoT puposes, if this is still
used,
Alice and her good friend Bob were able to sign their pub keys
remotely,
based on a free of charge verification method.
That’
Brandon Anderson wrote:
On 14 Jul 2021, at 23:52, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users
wrote:
It would tell me as 3rd party that for WoT puposes, if this is
still used,
Alice and her good friend Bob were able to sign their pub keys
remotely,
based on a free of charge verification method.
That’s
On 14 Jul 2021, at 23:52, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users
wrote:
It would tell me as 3rd party that for WoT puposes, if this is still
used,
Alice and her good friend Bob were able to sign their pub keys
remotely,
based on a free of charge verification method.
That’s what ordinary third-p
On 14 Jul 2021, at 23:52, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users
wrote:
It would tell me as 3rd party that for WoT puposes, if this is
still used,
Alice and her good friend Bob were able to sign their pub keys
remotely,
based on a free of charge verification method.
That’s what ordinary third-par
Andrew Gallagher wrote:
On 14 Jul 2021, at 23:52, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users
wrote:
It would tell me as 3rd party that for WoT puposes, if this is still
used,
Alice and her good friend Bob were able to sign their pub keys
remotely,
based on a free of charge verification method.
That’
Brandon Anderson wrote:
On 14 Jul 2021, at 23:52, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users
wrote:
It would tell me as 3rd party that for WoT puposes, if this is still
used,
Alice and her good friend Bob were able to sign their pub keys
remotely,
based on a free of charge verification method.
That’s
On 7/15/2021 12:51 AM, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users wrote:
Brandon Anderson wrote:
Andrew Gallagher wrote:
On 14 Jul 2021, at 18:34, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users
wrote:
Viktor wrote:
Is 'Стефан Васильев ' the same person that was
ban from this very list a fiew month back?
It looks l
On 14 Jul 2021, at 23:52, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users
wrote:
It would tell me as 3rd party that for WoT puposes, if this is still used,
Alice and her good friend Bob were able to sign their pub keys remotely,
based on a free of charge verification method.
That’s what ordinary third-party
> On 14 Jul 2021, at 23:52, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users
> wrote:
>
> It would tell me as 3rd party that for WoT puposes, if this is still used,
> Alice and her good friend Bob were able to sign their pub keys remotely,
> based on a free of charge verification method.
That’s what ordinary t
> On 14 Jul 2021, at 19:49, Стефан Васильев wrote:
>
> Andrew Gallagher wrote:
On 14 Jul 2021, at 18:34, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>>> Viktor wrote:
It's the same as putting any other public information in public key
certificate. You can put first and last na
Brandon Anderson wrote:
Andrew Gallagher wrote:
On 14 Jul 2021, at 18:34, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users
wrote:
Viktor wrote:
It's the same as putting any other public information in public key
certificate. You can put first and last name, email address and
even
photo of another person.
Andrew Gallagher wrote:
On 14 Jul 2021, at 18:34, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users
wrote:
Viktor wrote:
It's the same as putting any other public information in public key
certificate. You can put first and last name, email address and even
photo of another person.
But this information c
Johan Wevers wrote:
On 14-07-2021 19:32, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users wrote:
from trusted EU sources,
We may have a different idea about "trusted". There are enough fake
official ID's, like undercover police uses.
And on the other side the WoT and OpenPGP is/was never accepted in
Inte
On 14-07-2021 19:32, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users wrote:
> from trusted EU sources,
We may have a different idea about "trusted". There are enough fake
official ID's, like undercover police uses.
--
ir. J.C.A. Wevers
PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html
Andrew Gallagher wrote:
On 14 Jul 2021, at 18:34, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users
wrote:
Viktor wrote:
It's the same as putting any other public information in public key
certificate. You can put first and last name, email address and even
photo of another person.
But this information can
> On 14 Jul 2021, at 18:34, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users
> wrote:
>
> Viktor wrote:
>
>> It's the same as putting any other public information in public key
>> certificate. You can put first and last name, email address and even
>> photo of another person.
>
> But this information can be
Viktor wrote:
It's the same as putting any other public information in public key
certificate. You can put first and last name, email address and even
photo of another person.
But this information can be digitally verified and is issued EU wide by
Governemnt trusted sources in this field.
In
It's the same as putting any other public information in public key
certificate. You can put first and last name, email address and even
photo of another person.
In general: unless we have other trusted person to verify that public
key belongs to certain person, we can not ensure key owner ide
On 14-07-2021 15:41, Brandon Anderson via Gnupg-users wrote:
> What exactly stops me, a person wanting to impersonate that user, from
> putting the same QR-Code I got from that public key into my own keypair?
Nothing. This latest EU implementation of a social credit system is
intended to be used
accounts-gn...@holbrook.no wrote:
"online decoder" will part of the point is not to upload my qr to some
external site. That should strictly not be necessary.
Are there other qr decode apps (cli) out there that people have used
successfully with the corona qr surveillance trojan?
I don't know,
"online decoder" will part of the point is not to upload my qr to some
external site. That should strictly not be necessary.
Are there other qr decode apps (cli) out there that people have used
successfully with the corona qr surveillance trojan?
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 02:11:33PM +, Стефан
Maybe a bit off topic, but I've tired zbarimg and qtqr to scan that EU
covid qr code of mine, but neither could do it.
Is that some kind of custom encoding going on?
l
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 12:45:53PM +, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users wrote:
> if a person, within the EU, would put his COV
accounts-gn...@holbrook.no wrote:
Maybe a bit off topic, but I've tired zbarimg and qtqr to scan that EU
covid qr code of mine, but neither could do it.
Is that some kind of custom encoding going on?
Yes, it should work. What you can try is to use an online QR decoder
and use from the obtained
Brandon Anderson wrote:
What exactly stops me, a person wanting to impersonate that user, from
putting the same QR-Code I got from that public key into my own
keypair?
Nothing, if you obtained the pub key from a key server! The idea would
be that Alice and Bob, not having a CA, nor WoT signatur
What exactly stops me, a person wanting to impersonate that user, from
putting the same QR-Code I got from that public key into my own keypair?
On 7/14/21 5:45 AM, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users wrote:
if a person, within the EU, would put his COVID vaccination
certificate QR-Code
in his pub-k
if a person, within the EU, would put his COVID vaccination certificate
QR-Code
in his pub-key as photo-ID I would say that than another GnuPG user,
within
the EU, or maybe later in the U.S. and elsewhere too, would have the
assurance,
without that the public key is otherwise signed, that this p
27 matches
Mail list logo
