On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 08:04:53 -0600, Stewart V Wright said:
> Can someone then please update the information on the web pages to be
> relevant to SVN as opposed to CVS (I'm assuming that you're not
Yeah, we should really do this. However due to our fully automated
content management system it is n
Stewart V. Wright wrote:
> Can someone then please update the information on the web pages to be
> relevant to SVN as opposed to CVS (I'm assuming that you're not
> running both concurrently).
The cvs servers are still operational, just no longer updated.
README.WARNING-REPOSITORY-NOT-CURRENT say
G'day David,
* David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051105 07:45]:
>
> It's as official as any release that hasn't happened yet: that is to
> say, we're happy and thrilled if you test it out and report bugs (to
> gnupg-devel), but you'll have to compile it from the SVN repository,
> and it's not consi
