Looks altered to me.
On Friday 09 March 2007 21:13, Laurent Jumet wrote:
> Hello !
>
> If you see an armored message here, don't assume it's crypted, it's
> only
armored
> may be. Run GPG against it first, and delete after; and not the contrary.
> :-)
ClearSign signatures may be altered th
Hello David !
David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please do not send messages like this. Among the various problems it
> causes, it renders the list archive on the web useless, and that list
> archive is important for people to find information. This is what
> this looks like on the web:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 05:13:23AM +0100, Laurent Jumet wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
>
> owNCWmg2MUFZJlNZ7oQR9wAA6v///nJhSmCnx5xv/FgAv//faoFA0ojgE8kVIwDA
> QACgkwQwAU1BBqjT1E1PaJinqAaepoPUZA0AyaAA0AyA9IA9Q2k80ocAA0GhoNAB
> pkGhkDTQAAGQAZAZAAiYgp6nppEwmR6mh
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
owNCWmg2MUFZJlNZ7oQR9wAA6v///nJhSmCnx5xv/FgAv//faoFA0ojgE8kVIwDA
QACgkwQwAU1BBqjT1E1PaJinqAaepoPUZA0AyaAA0AyA9IA9Q2k80ocAA0GhoNAB
pkGhkDTQAAGQAZAZAAiYgp6nppEwmR6mhkANAANADQ0NGhkpqqmdGPct1Dqt
un6INh4lgErWJRfWsJ7LSSef40GcDvpWZQwlSasmCIU
