On Thu, 17 May 2018 13:11, roman.fied...@ait.ac.at said:
> How could that work together with the memory based "wipe" approach, you
> envisioned in your message
> https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2018-May/060379.html , last
> paragraph?
Tha is a different layer. Basically a part o
> Von: Werner Koch [mailto:w...@gnupg.org]
>
> On Wed, 16 May 2018 16:24, roman.fied...@ait.ac.at said:
>
> > In my opinion it is hard to find such a "one size fits all"
> > solution. Like Werner's example: disabling decryption streaming
>
> The goal of the MDC is to assure that the message has bee
On Wed, 16 May 2018 16:24, roman.fied...@ait.ac.at said:
> In my opinion it is hard to find such a "one size fits all"
> solution. Like Werner's example: disabling decryption streaming
The goal of the MDC is to assure that the message has been received
exactly as the sender set it. Thus there is
> Von: Andrew Gallagher [mailto:andr...@andrewg.com]
>
> > On 16 May 2018, at 13:44, Fiedler Roman
> wrote:
> >
> > I am not sure, if gpg could support
> > implementation/testing/life-cycle-efforts
> to establish all those parameters and different process models for most of the
> decryption proce
> I’m going to preemptively quote RJH here before he gets around to it. Use the
> defaults! ;-)
:)
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
> On 16 May 2018, at 13:44, Fiedler Roman wrote:
>
> I am not sure, if gpg could support implementation/testing/life-cycle-efforts
> to establish all those parameters and different process models for most of
> the decryption processes gpg users envision to use gpg for.
Why do we need a pletho
> Von: Werner Koch [mailto:w...@gnupg.org]
>
> On Tue, 15 May 2018 11:44, roman.fied...@ait.ac.at said:
>
> > The status line format should be designed to support those variants to
> > allow a "logical consistency check" of the communication with GnuPG
>
> There is a
>
> DECRYPTION_FAILED
>
> and t
