On Oct 28, 2008, at 2:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com
wrote on Tue Oct 28 17:00:07 CET 2008 :
Now that is an... interesting key. It's a V4 (OpenPGP) key with V3
(PGP 2.x) binding signature). GPG won't cross-certify such a key
because it is a one-way change
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 14:49 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> so,
> is there any way that gnupg *could* do it?
> (i.e.
> --ignore-v3-signature
> --unchangeable-expiration-date
> --cross-certify-just-do-it-override)
>
> or any other really cool undocumented option ;-)
>
> *NOT* a feature request,
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com
wrote on Tue Oct 28 17:00:07 CET 2008 :
>Now that is an... interesting key. It's a V4 (OpenPGP) key with V3
>(PGP 2.x) binding signature). GPG won't cross-certify such a key
>because it is a one-way change. Once cross-certified, the binding
>signature will be
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:48:21AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:42:14 -0400
> >From: David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: PGP 6.5.8 ckt, just say no. (was: Re: set type digest
> >mode?
>
> >On Oct 24, 200
>Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:42:14 -0400
>From: David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: PGP 6.5.8 ckt, just say no. (was: Re: set type digest
>mode?
>On Oct 24, 2008, at 10:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> [1] any ckt V4 rsa keys generated,
>>
On Oct 24, 2008, at 10:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1] any ckt V4 rsa keys generated,
have the rsa subkey as both sign and encrypt,
and there is (as yet, afaik,) no way
that gnupg can be used to get such a key to cross-certify the
primary key,
and since the subkey will be used by default by
