Alphax wrote:
The time is ripe for a GPG variant: ("GPG-lean" ?): a public key
encryption utility with no built-in e-mail ties and no attempt
whatsoever to incorporate the solution for the authentication
problem. (For the majority of us, fingerprint-exchange-by-voice
>>is perfectly adequate).
cdr wrote:
> MUS1876 wrote:
>> Alphax wrote:
>>> I have friends who currently don't want to use PGP because they
>>> fear that their keys will be uploaded to a keyserver, and then
>>> they will be spammed forever more.
>>
>>
>> I totally agree what friends of Alphax say.
>>
>> Wouldn't it be cute t
MUS1876 wrote:
I have
friends who currently don't want to use PGP because they fear that
>>their
keys will be uploaded to a keyserver, and then they will be spammed
forever more.
I totally agree what friends of Alphax say.
Wouldn't it be cute to have a sepcial option to flag both keys and
s
> I have
> friends who currently don't want to use PGP because they fear that their
> keys will be uploaded to a keyserver, and then they will be spammed
> forever more.
Hi,
I totally agree what friends of Alphax say.
Wouldn't it be cute to have a sepcial option to flag both keys and
subkeys as
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:34:53PM +0200, MUS1876 wrote:
> > I have
> > friends who currently don't want to use PGP because they fear that their
> > keys will be uploaded to a keyserver, and then they will be spammed
> > forever more.
>
> Hi,
>
> I totally agree what friends of Alphax say.
>
> W
> I have
> friends who currently don't want to use PGP because they fear that their
> keys will be uploaded to a keyserver, and then they will be spammed
> forever more.
Hi,
I totally agree what friends of Alphax say.
Wouldn't it be cute to have a sepcial option to flag both keys and
subkeys as
