IIRC, the source to PGP is available, but only for "peer review"
purposes. The license prohibits compiling your own PGP binaries. I might
be wrong. It's been a long time since I've read the license.
You are almost right. you may make binaries, but not for use, only for
testing PGP for exploits. Fo
Charly Avital wrote:
>I am a MacUser, I have used PGP since 1994 (version 2.6.x) for Macintosh
> Operating System 7.1, then different iterations of PGP for different
>Mac operating systems, till the current PGP 9.x for Macintosh.
OK, Mac seems to be supported.
>I really don't know whether the
Erpo wrote:
>IIRC, the source to PGP is available, but only for "peer review"
>purposes. The license prohibits compiling your own PGP binaries.
There's so much forbidden... PGP doesn't seen to act aggressively against
people who do, like the person who compiles the CKT versions.
>> GnuPG has oth
Hi Erpo,
On Wed, 11 May 2005 14:04:19 -0700 you wrote:
> IIRC, the source to PGP is available, but only for "peer review"
> purposes. The license prohibits compiling your own PGP binaries. I might
> be wrong. It's been a long time since I've read the license.
From the PGP 8 license:
"What You
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 15:21 +0200, Johan Wevers wrote:
> Isn't the source of pgp 9 available? Can't you compile your own version with
> the limitations stripped out? If source isn't available for this version I
> wouldn't use it anyway.
IIRC, the source to PGP is available, but only for "peer revi
Charly Avital wrote:
>I really don't care to compile PGP also. Come to think of it, I'm not
>sure I would know how to do it.
The advantage would be that you would be able to remove the crippleware
instructions before compiling.
>>>Someone suggested $ 19.00 or 29.00. Reasonable. I would even agr
Charly Avital wrote:
>I bought a perpetual Enterprise license for PGP 8.x, but I understand
>and agree that the upgrade to PGP 9.x could not, and should not be for
>free.
Isn't the source of pgp 9 available? Can't you compile your own version with
the limitations stripped out? If source isn't a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I bought a perpetual Enterprise license for PGP 8.x, but I understand
and agree that the upgrade to PGP 9.x could not, and should not be for
free.
But $ 69.00 "special" price for holders of a 8.x license?
No.
Someone suggested $ 19.00 or 29.00. Rea
