On 13/12/10 9:59 AM, David Tomaschik wrote:
> My guess is that it has something to do with the fact that this list
> (bizarrely, IMO) uses reply to sender by default rather than reply to
> list. Some MUAs may mangle the Message ID in such a case (when the list
> email is manually specified).
This
My guess is that it has something to do with the fact that this list
(bizarrely, IMO) uses reply to sender by default rather than reply to list.
Some MUAs may mangle the Message ID in such a case (when the list email is
manually specified).
Just a guess.
David
2010/12/12 Łukasz Stelmach
> Hel
Hello.
I've noticed that Gmane's doing something evil to message-ids in this
group. I read several other groups via Gmane and this is *the only* that
has such broken threading.
E.g.
Hank Ivy started the "Protecting IDs at a keysigning party" thread with
e message
<201012081420.14986.hank...@
