On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 10:12 -0400, Brian Mearns wrote:
> In case you missed it, using 15 as a key value is no longer a viable
> option:
> http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/chip-does-part-of-codecracking-quantum-algorithm
Thank God! I've used 17 ;)
Cheers,
Chris.
smime.p7s
Description
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 10:29 -0400, Brian Mearns wrote:
> > Thank God! I've used 17 ;)
> No you didn't, 17 is prime. =D
*D'Ohh* ... caught me ;)
Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg
2009/9/10 Christoph Anton Mitterer
:
> On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 10:12 -0400, Brian Mearns wrote:
>> In case you missed it, using 15 as a key value is no longer a viable
>> option:
>> http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/chip-does-part-of-codecracking-quantum-algorithm
> Thank God! I've used 17
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 10:12 -0400, Brian Mearns wrote:
> In case you missed it, using 15 as a key value is no longer a viable
> option:
Hasn't been for many years. The advancement is in reducing the size of
the quantum computing device, not in factoring a larger number.
We factored 15 via Shor's
In case you missed it, using 15 as a key value is no longer a viable
option:
http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/chip-does-part-of-codecracking-quantum-algorithm
Fortunately, people are working on it:
http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/cryptographers-take-on-quantum-computers
-B
