> Ingo Klöcker hat am 13. Februar 2016 um 19:55
> geschrieben:
>
>
> On Saturday 13 February 2016 18:20:09 st...@mailbox.org wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > a few days ago I downloaded
> >
> >
> > http://gensho.acc.umu.se/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-te
> > sting-amd64-DVD-1.iso Resolvi
at the server is/was
compromised?
What would such information tell us exactly?
I am trying to figure out what does and what it does not tell us in order
to better understand the heuristic scope of gpg's output.
Any help, hint or assessment is appreciate
roceeding be
a security risk, better leaving them disabled forever?
--> follow the remaining steps indicated in the referred FSFE's
card-howTo-doc (1)
Any objections, hints welcome.
Stebe
(1) https://wiki.fsfe.org/Card_howtos/Card_with_subkeys_using_backups
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
m pubring.kbx on the
separate flash drive and reimport it (in)to pubring.gpg on the target OS
AND copy the private-keys-v1.d folder to the .gnupg directory of the
target OS (and then perform the remaining steps)?
Or is there something else I should take into account?
Any confirmation/help
org/Card_howtos/Card_with_subkeys_using_backups
Stebe
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
SAGE:[letter], as I can't think of any other way of
referring to that key. USAGE, however, is blank. I couldn't find any
further details about it in the manpages.
Is there a way to delete this subkey?
TIA
Stebe
(1)https://wiki.fsfe.org/Ca
. at work) I'd positively choose docbook5-xml.
Well, sorry for not being the old wise guy with 20 years of experience
(pretty old yes, wise hmm), but that's what I can tell you.
Cheers,
Stebe
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Yes, that would be useful, and the wiki is the right place to publish it.
I'll contribute to it, maybe it should be made available in different
languages. Anyone else out there willing to lend a hand?
Stebe
> Don Saklad hat am 4. Februar 2016 um 09:42
> geschrieben:
>
gpg.conf? If so, could you include it as well.
> >
> > Peter.
> >
I had problems downloading your gpg.conf, so I'm just guessing (sorry :-)
# If you have more than 1 secret key in your keyring, you may want to
# uncomment the following option and set your preferred keyid.
? It is possible to resolve
> this ??
unfortunately I cannot answer you in detail but have you checked
(particularly the Troubleshooting section)?
(1) https://github.com/OpenSC/OpenSC/wiki/OpenPGP-card
HTH
Stebe
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
g like that? I have to admit my grasp of German is
> mostly
> passive: I can read it slowly, I can follow it if people articulate
> well, but
> actively producing German is mainly good for laughs.
You're right with your supposition. The German wording should positively
be changed. It makes people think that the action of revoking may have
already been carried out, whereas the English informs of the keys'
ability/capacity to revoke the key.
Thanks a lot.
Stebe
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
validity.
>
No, I haven't. Yes, you're right, the encryption subkey had been revoked,
not the key, and I don't have the revokers' keys in my keyring. Thanks to
Peter's indications I could determine what it was all about.
Thanks.
Stebe
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
in the last line, which
in fact is the uid) but I didn't pay attention to the fact that it
actually refers to the enryption subkey.
Gnupg-users and developers, Debian people, I beg your pardon.
Stebe
> Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
>
_
that? What does it mean? How can I check further if it actually has
been revoked?
Thanks in advance for any helpful input. And forgive me if I can't see the
wood for the trees!
Stebe
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ntaining the keys that are supposed to
be used for gpg verification, such as for example
/usr/share/program-name/signing-keys.d is required as a prerequisite. You
can then use this library to do the gpg verification for you.
Cheers,
Stebe
___
Gnup
tc/xdg/autostart/gnome-keyring-gpg.desktop-disable --add
/etc/xdg/autostart/gnome-keyring-gpg.desktop
If you later decide to reenable it, then you can use:
$ sudo dpkg-divert --rename --remove
/etc/xdg/autostart/gnome-keyring-gpg.desktop
http://wiki.gnupg.org/GnomeKeyring
Cheers,
Stebe
___
t to sign the key with another of your user IDs, you
must give an "-u" option on the command line together with the
"--edit-key".
HTH
Stebe
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
what is it that you actually want to do? Or was it just a general
question?
Cheers,
Stebe
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ill trying to find out whether it has something to do with
them or not.
Cheers,
Stebe
P.S. I plan to write a HowTo concerning installation and usage of
NitrokeyPro with the
latest gnupg2.1.10 version for the wiki, from the point of view of a
beginner/medium-skilled user, if it fits in
Hi,
why have I been receiving the mails of this list via gnupg-users-bounces
for a couple of months now, whereas before that I had been receiving them
from the gnupg-users? Is there any reason for this?
TIA
Stebe
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg
deas how to solve this within 32 bit oldstable? Is it better to post
it on a Debian specific forum/mailing list? Or to upgrade right away to 64
bit jessie using apt --dist-upgrade?
Any ideas welcome.
Cheers,
Stebe
(1) https://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/index.en.html
__
does not have
any distributing agent neither in France (nor in other any country) and
its potential users download it at their own discretion from servers
located outside France (so there isn't taking place any import in the
commercial/legal sense) I think that this specific French legis
ou might as well
use --local-users instead.
Section 4.8.3 Signing a Message also details that you can modify your
gpgsm.conf to have gpgsm sign with your new key.
"The key used for signing is the default one or the one specified in the
configuration file." So it's here and not the .mutt
ificate's signature by using the public key of the certificate that
> has issued the certificate to be verified?
Resolved. I have found the specific command line syntax. And sorry (to the
author/translator), there IS a German Enigmail handbook translation. I
only use the English origi
> Bob Henson hat am 29. Dezember 2015 um 10:07
> geschrieben:
>
>
> On 28/12/2015 10:22 pm, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015, Steve Butler wrote:
> >
> If, as you imply above, you are looking for a more universal system of
> encryption, then PGP/OpenPGP certainly isn't the
25 matches
Mail list logo
