Why do you need to use gpg for this task when you only need a symmetric
cipher. You would be better off going to CPAN (perl) and download AES
(Advanced Encryption Standard) module and use all of the features coming
with it or use libcrypt (used by gnupg) and use this. The other
solution, I can thin
I have successfully created a cart.p12 and when I tried to import the cent I
got this:
gpgsm --call-protect-tool --p12-import --store cert.p12
gpg-protect-tool: gpg-agent is not available in this session
gpg-protect-tool: error while asking for the passphrase: Invalid digest
algorithm
What do I
Dear all,
I have found a very nice picture of project Agypten(I am missing gnupg).
This made me thing about gnupg modular approach. So, I would like to ask
you for revision of my thoughts. Gnupg is a modular application composed
of a crypto module based on libcrypt(independent development), a
comp
Can I say about gnupg that is modular? If yes, does exist a map of the
modules?
Thanks in advance Martin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
I have found on the Internet that Mr. Koch gave a speech about gnupg
internals and I would be very interested if any documents exist about
this presentation or in any other doc about gnupg internals. I know that
the source code is the best internal docs but I need a very quick
overview.
Thanks in
Sorry to bother, but are there any differences between gpg and gpgsm
apps. The only difference I can see is the supported standards
(OpenPGP, S/MIME). Should I see gpgsm as a supplement to gpg and
pre-version for gpg2, which is the version with both standards
implemented?
Thanks in advance
Martin
I have seen in the spec rfc3156 that a message should be signed and
then encrypted, but hypothetically if send a message to someone I do
not like and sign it and then encrypt it he/she can forward it to
someone else pretending that the message was originally from my self.
Is there anything I have
Yes, I meant this. I can thing of other solutions as s-e-s or
signing the header of email messages in separate mime part, but it would
consume cpu, as you would not be able to sign a message and simply
encrypt it n-times with recipients keys. So the best way around this
problem is to educate users
I have found on the Internet that Mr. Koch gave a speech about gnupg
internals and I would be very interested if any documents exist about
this presentation or in any other doc about gnupg internals. I know that
the source code is the best internal docs but I need a very quick
overview.
Thanks in
I have seen in the spec rfc3156 that a message should be signed and
then encrypted, but hypothetically if send a message to someone I do
not like and sign it and then encrypt it he/she can forward it to
someone else pretending that the message was originally from my self.
Is there anything I have m
10 matches
Mail list logo