On 28/04/2016, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> On 04/28/2016 06:02 AM, Richard Ulrich wrote:
> >I use the stock versions from the ubuntu 16.04 repository:
> >gnupg 1.4.20-1ubuntu3
> >gnupg2 2.1.11-6ubuntu2
> >gnupg-agent 2.1.11-6ubuntu2
> >scdaemon 2.1.11-6ubuntu2
>
> Good, Ubuntu has GnuPG 2.1 (eventually,
On 28/04/2016, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 28/04/16 02:23, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> > In my environment of Debian, those variables are set by:
> > /etc/X11/Xsession.d/90gpg-agent
>
> After I installed GnuPG 2.1 on my Debian Jessie (which doesn't have 2.1
> itself), I encountered annoying issues. I also
On 23/05/2015, Rex Kneisley wrote:
> Hello all,
Hi,
> I have just done a clean install of Debian 8.0 on an i7-4790K with 16 GB RAM.
> I am trying to install GNUPG 2.1.4
> (I have this thing about wanting the latest version… call me crazy)
>
> I have done this before in Debian Wheezy. I install
Ah, even more explanatory is this page:
http://www.gnupg.org/(en)/download/supported_systems.html
Without forgetting my more specific questions in the last e-mail, what
does it take for Solaris to move from the "Other OSs" category to the
"Supported Systems" category?
On
ut
from this module IS random to an acceptable degree and it's acceptable
to use it with GPG"? Is there any reason why you would not suggest
using that kernel module to support GPG?
On 8/1/06, David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 06:06:54PM -0400, Daniel Gu
ty works in the manner it should on Solaris.
Thanks!
--
Dan Guido
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
