Doug Barton writes:
> On 3/25/15 11:08 AM, Bob (Robert) Cavanaugh wrote:
>> Doug,
>> Signature shows as an attachment "signature.asc". No evidence that PGP
>> actions were envoked. Work forces use of Synaptic PGP, so I cannot tell if
>> it is verified or not.
>
> Thanks Bob, that is interestin
Doug Barton writes:
> On 3/12/15 2:59 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:23, dougb@dougbarton.email said:
>>
>>> PuTTY also has its own agent support, which works quite well. I'm not
>>> sure why it's necessary to reinvent the wheel here. :)
>>
>> Because that integrates seemless w
Doug Barton writes:
> Otherwise, there is an easy way to solve your problem on the Windows
> platform, you should strongly consider it.
I fear I do not understand. Did I miss something ? Off course I'd
rather go the easy way ! :D
Regards
-- Xavier.
Doug Barton writes:
> On 3/11/15 3:15 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
>> The standard ssh client on Windows seems to be Putty; you may use it
>> with the native GnuPG for Windows (i.e. Gpg4win) by using the option
>> --enable-putty-support instead of --enable-ssh-support.
>
> PuTTY also has its own agent
Hi all,
On my workstation, I have installed cygwin and GPG4win which is
bundled with a version of gpg-agent (cygwin comes whith oldies and
no gpg-agent AFAICS).
I enabled ssh support in the gpg-agent.conf file as usual and I
clearly see the socket files for both GNUpg and SSH.
When starting a cy
Helmut Waitzmann writes:
> So it's a problem with my http proxy?
Seems like actually.
-- Xavier.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Helmut
Helmut Waitzmann writes:
> gpg2 --verbose --keyserver hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net --send-keys --
> 72ABFF0923A87CF22D0ED7C4FDEE765D017077F1
try without the -- stuff:
gpg2 --verbose --keyserver hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net --send
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Mark,
Mark Walter writes:
> I have a pass phrase that contains an exclamation mark (!). I can
> decrypt fine manually, however when I try to put this into a batch
> file, and pipe the the pass phrase to the gpg command to decrypt
> the file, it
Hauke Laging writes:
> Am Mi 18.02.2015, 21:29:40 schrieb Xavier Maillard:
>
>> Just a quick question: do I need to have both keypairs in my keyring
>> ? I mean both my old secret key and my new secret key.
>
> Of course. Would be strange if you could make a signature
Peter Lebbing writes:
> On 2015-02-19 18:16, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
>> I also like @ to hide useless output, but is downloading *and
>> executing* from a remote location really something you should hide?
>> Especially if everything else isn't hidden?
>
> I can understand you're pretty darn pi
Hi Ville,
Ville Määttä writes:
> I happen to use Mail so for a long time I’ve been using the GPGMail
> plugin with a brewed[2] upstream GnuPG. I.e. *just one of the
> things in the GPG Suite*. I’ve talked about this setup before in
> the thread [3]. If one doesn’t use Apple Mail there is no reas
Hi Jesper,
Jesper Hess Nielsen writes:
>> gpg -u -u --clearsign keytransition.txt >
>> keytransition.signed2
>>
>
> woops, forget about the '> keytransition.signed2' part. Just running
> with --clearsign will give you a keytransition.txt.asc file
> automatically.
Thnaks for that Jesper.
Just
Hi,
in order to announce my new GPG key< I have written a key transition
document.
I am at the step where I should/must sign it with both keys (old and
new one).
I can sign (inline) my document using this:
gpg --output keytransition.signed --clearsign keytransition.txt
This works for one GPG k
MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> writes:
>>> My preference is Inline: I want everything right there
>>> in the message body where I can see it.
>
>> Exactly what is it you feel the over powering urge to
>> see?
>
> If the message text is covered by a signature, I want to see the
> s
Peter Lebbing writes:
> On 2015-02-13 15:07, Brian Minton wrote:
>> if you have a 4096 bit RSA key, please dont sign inline. The
>> signature block is
>> ridiculously long.
>
> You'll find it is actually even an 8192 bit RSA key.
Yes sorry. I should add a smaller key for that purpose ...
Regar
des-apare.cido...@autistici.org writes:
>> Maybe I cannot offer a big rule for THE preferred way. Jerry is
>> right, but maybe we HAVE to deal with recipients who have no
>> influence to take a mail client which is capable to handle PGP/MIME
>> sigbatures properly. Then it is also MY problem.
>
>
Robert J. Hansen writes:
>> in my quest of the perfect setup, I am asking myself what is the
>> prefered way to sign a message: inline (like this one) or using a
>> MIME header ?
>>
>> Is there a big thumb rule to respect ?
>
> https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#use_pgpmime
THank you for
Jerry writes:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:46:33 +0100, Xavier Maillard stated:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> in my quest of the perfect setup, I am asking myself what is the
>> prefered way to sign a message: inline (like this one) or using a MIME
>> header ?
>&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
in my quest of the perfect setup, I am asking myself what is the
prefered way to sign a message: inline (like this one) or using a MIME header ?
Is there a big thumb rule to respect ?
Regards
- --
Sent with my mu4e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
flapflap writes:
> Xavier Maillard:
>>
>> Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
>>
>>> On Wed 2015-02-11 00:41:18 -0500, Xavier Maillard wrote:
>>>> May I ask how one would sign public keys when a "master key" is
>>>> stored onto an USB s
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> On Wed 2015-02-11 00:41:18 -0500, Xavier Maillard wrote:
>> May I ask how one would sign public keys when a "master key" is
>> stored onto an USB stick ?
>>
>> I followed instructions from [1]. Now I am in the process of
>&
Hello,
May I ask how one would sign public keys when a "master key" is
stored onto an USB stick ?
I followed instructions from [1]. Now I am in the process of
announcing my key transition to all old signers *but*, as a last
test, I just tested public signature with my "master key" and this is
whe
22 matches
Mail list logo
