On 27/09/10 16:21, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:56:52 +0200, Vjaceslavs Klimovs
> wrote:
>> I did some quick tests on Nokia N900 (600 MHz ARM CPU), with gnupg
>> 1.4.6, here is what I got:
>>
>> Encrypting and signing, 2048 bit RSA keys:
>>
On 27/09/10 11:12, David Smith wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> On 09/24/2010 09:54 AM, David Shaw wrote:
>>> It won't work with the current generation of OpenPGP smartcards. It also
>>> will be dreadfully slow if you (or someone you are communicating with) ever
>>> uses the key on a small
Hi,
Thank you for all your replies. It seems that multiple separate keys is
the way to go for me. Is it socially acceptable to ask someone to sign
several keys, for example during key signing event? Is this a common
occurrence?
___
Gnupg-users mailing li
Hi,
If I have multiple not related e-mail accounts, is it better to create
one key pair with multiple identities or a separate key pair for every
account?
Is it good idea to create 4096 bit keys when creating new key pair? I
read through archives on this mailing list, and it seems there is no
real
