On 7-May-06, at 7:17 AM, markus reichelt wrote:
po/de.po:msgstr "%d marignal-needed, %d complete-needed, %s
Trust-Modell\n"
I guess it should be "marginal-needed"
and "Trust-Model".
--
Trevor Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP.sig
Description: This is a
ly you need to modify this somewhat to run on DOS (or Windows,
or whatever it's called these days) but it may point you in the right
direction.
--
Trevor Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
)
Incidentally, AES256 is really, really strong. How strong is your
public key? In most cases, the public key is not as strong as AES256,
Thanks. That's also an excellent point. (Naturally, my public key is
not 15360-bit.)
--
Trevor Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
also
forcing asymmetric encryption to use AES256 as the session cipher,
which might cause problems.
Then again, if I send emails that I might not want people to decrypt
5 or 10 years from now, would I want session ciphers to be defaulting
to AES256 instead of CAST5? Why is this the default?
ers from a weakness
that AES256 does not. Is this true?
--
Trevor Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users