> I'm confused. You seemed to be making quite a point of it. (-:
I'm confused too, that makes two ;) I didn't think about specific expiration
times of subkeys. I tried to figure out why everybody has no revoked subkeys at
all...
> There are others on this list better placed to answer this. As f
> Recommended by whom and against what threat model? And, really, the
> same lifespan for signing keys as for encryption keys?
To be honest I didn't think and search about that too much, but that was not
the point anyways...
> My take on the advice I have most often seen in previous
> discussion
Am 08.12.2014 um 00:40 schrieb MFPA:
>
>
> On Sunday 7 December 2014 at 3:04:09 PM, in
> , Tomo Ruby wrote:
>
>
>> If I create a main key to certify
>> and subkeys for everything else, won't there be dozens
>> of subkeys on my main key after years of cr
On 12/07/2014 10:16 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 12/07/2014 10:11 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> Why do you believe that you will be creating and revoking so many
>> subkeys?
>
> ...expiration of encryption subkeys
> and key rotation.
Hey, thanks for the answers so far! The most important
not...
Thanks in advance!!
Tomo Ruby
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
