Hi!
On Mo, 2016-03-14 at 11:55 +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> --quick-sign-key fpr [names]
> --quick-lsign-key fpr [names]
>
> Directly sign a key from the passphrase without any
> further user interaction.
That's already quite helpful.
Can I make GnuPG not save t
Hi.
On Do, 2016-02-25 at 08:24 +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> Thus I am not convinced that the revocation reasons are useful for
> any automated evaluation.
Can I tell GnuPG that I, as a user, am convinced that the superseded
revocation reason is correct?
I've grepped through the gpg man page and on
Hi.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 03:35:09PM -0400, F Rafi wrote:
> Does anyone use a GPG library to embed file encryption processes within
> python code? Which libraries do you use? Any recommendations?
As far as I understand, the GPGME-based pygpgme is the
embraced library: https://launchpad.net/pygpg
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:09:30AM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> Create a new key:
>
> $ gpg --no-options --quick-gen-key 'test key '
> About to create a key for:
> "test key "
>
> Continue? (Y/n) y
> public and secret key created and signed.
>
> pub rsa2048/50C4476F 2015-03-
e key. I don't see your
script signing every UID separately.
I was also hoping for less shell script and more of something I could
dictate to my mom over the phone.
Cheers,
Tobi
> On 02-12-2014 PM 02:05, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I'm digging up this thr
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:11:22AM +0100, outa wrote:
> Has anyone experienced the same problem and could point me to a solution?
Not necessarily a solution, but a pointer to a discussion which took place:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2014-August/thread.html#28689
Cheers,
Tobi
Hi.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 01:49:36PM +0100, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> Probably monkeyscan from monkeysign...
FWIW: A tool with a similar goal is GNOME Keysign:
https://github.com/muelli/geysigning (Note that the repository will move, so
this link will become defunct)
Contrasting caff or monkeysign
Hi.
I'm digging up this thread because it asked the same question I have,
but it hasn't really been answered:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 06:23:35AM +, atair wrote:
> Is there a way to achieve the same signatures from gpg command line?
> For example
> $ gpg -a --export
> exports the complete key
Hello.
While investigating the state of the art of Python bindings
I came across the problem of signing other people's keys.
For example, in https://github.com/isislovecruft/python-gnupg/issues/29
is a complaint about the behaviour of --sign-key:
By default, --sign-key drops you into an inter
Heya :)
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:32:19PM +0200, Albrecht Will wrote:
> if I start KGPG I get an error-message translated from German to English):
FWIW: If you start your applications with "LC_ALL=C" in the environment
variables, you should get genuine messages, i.e. type "export LC_ALL=C"
bef
Hey folks :)
For the fun of it, I tried to parse a few weekly dumps (i.e. from here:
http://keys.niif.hu/keydump/) and very often,
not even GnuPG can successfully parse the packets, i.e. gpg
--list-packets fails. Usually with "gpg: mpi too large for this
implementation (56104 bits)" but there is a
11 matches
Mail list logo
