Laurent Jumet wrote:
>> Thanx, I missed that. So this is one of the "sign only"
>> keys and to enable encryption, one would add an encryption
>> only subkey?
>
> Not on that one, it's a RSA key.
But if I see it correctly, it's _no_ v3 key so you can
add a subkey to this key even if it is RSA
Olaf Gellert wrote:
> keys and to enable encryption, one would add an encryption
> only subkey?
IIRC, it is not possible to change the capabilities of an
existing key with GPG. Somebody might correct me if I'm wrong.
And yes, the only way to encrypt to this key is to add an
encryption subkey to
Olaf Gellert wrote:
> 0xCC21E10F. The key is self-signed, gpg --check-sigs
> does not complain, but still when I try to encrypt
> I get:
>
> gpg: 0xCC21E10F: skipped: unusable public key
pub 2048R/CC21E10F created: 2006-11-21 expires: never usage: SC
This is the information given in --
Bruce Cowin wrote:
> I notice that sometimes when I right click on a file, this key doesn't appear
> in the key
> lists and sometimes it does. Has anyone else experienced this? Do we know
> why it does this?
Do you use GPGee or the WinPT File Manager?
GPGee has a website with a forum for su
Robert Eden wrote:
> I don't want windows shell extensions as that would require an
> Installer (WinPT ).
Actually WinPT does not install any shell extensions.
(Windows Privacy Tray, not the obsolete SF.net project!)
And furthermore, I currently work on WinPT Mobile which does not depend
on any
Julia Dashkevich wrote:
> no tool for uninstalling my current version separately
> from gpg4win. What are the steps for updating winpt
> to the newer version and can it be done without
> affecting the current gpg installation?
Just unzip the ZIP archive and overwrite the ptd.dll
and the winpt.d
Julia Dashkevich wrote:
> the MUA. Tried the same thing with gpgshell, and it
> worked fine. Do you think it is a bug?
When the feature does not work with _any_ window on
your system, the answer is yes. Otherwise no. The
current window mode should work for almost every window
but in reality it
Johan Wevers schrieb:
> Does anyone know how to set the homedir that WinPT assumes for gpg
> to another place as Application Data? I want it to be somewhere in
> My Documents on my PC at work. Changing the registry entry for gpg
> didn't work for WinPT.
There is a bug in the current code. I fixed
On Thu Jun 22 2006; 10:10, Kim Haverblad wrote:
> located I found that the pubring.gpg has been copied to pubring.bak and
> pubring.gpg is now empty?! What went wrong here?
The WinPT program never openes any keyring in write-mode. For the
backup, just the pubring.gpg will be copied to pubring-bak
On Mon May 08 2006; 20:09, Sarixe Avaliesz wrote:
> ... I have no idea how this happened, but now, on each new computer I
> use, WinPT is asking me where GPG is. It seems that the registry
> settings just remember where gpg is, and the program just asks if it
> doesn't see anything. this isn't a
Hi!
After years in the frozen state, I decided to reawake GPGoe again.
For those who don't know GPGoe, it's a GPG plug-in for the Outlook
Express mailer. It provides inline-PGP operations (sign, encrypt, both)
and some features to make replies to encrypted mails a lot of easier.
And of course it
On Thu Mar 23 2006; 10:26, Remco Post wrote:
> you'll need to download the latest beta fot winpt from the
> sourceforge page, it's much better.
You propably meant gforge page because the sourceforge page is
not up-to-date. In general the easiest way to download the latest
version is http://www.w
On Mon Jan 30 2006; 11:51, Johan Wevers wrote:
> >I fixed this in the CVS. A new release should be available within
> >some hours.
>
> OK, 0.11.7 starts fine. Was the problem indeed related to v3 keys?
Yes.
> They can't be that uncommon.
I tested it with several keys without any problems. Th
On Fri Jan 27 2006; 01:10, Johan Wevers wrote:
> Still gives the same error: a NULL pointer assignment:
>
> The instruction at "0x00441dfd" referenced memory at "0x". The
> memory could not be read.
I fixed this in the CVS. A new release should be available within
some hours.
On Thu Jan 26 2006; 14:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> why only some of us, Johan, myself, and only a very few others, are
> having it, and why it is hard for most others to reproduce it ...
>
> _v3 rsa keys_ !
Excellent work.
> on my other machine, with existing gnupg keyrings,
> with v3 key
On Wed Jan 25 2006; 23:33, Johan Wevers wrote:
> (except the keyserver config) from the old WinPT dir and copied the new
> files there. However, now WinPT crashes at startup. This happens both at
I got some reports about this problem but I was never able to reproduce it.
On most machines it works
engage wrote:
can refresh or add to the public keyring from the CLI with gpg but I can't
refresh the keys using the same server from within WinPT.
There might be a problem with the code. Please can you check out
0.11.4 (0.10.1 is rather obsolete)?
Timo
On Wed Dec 28 2005; 00:36, Nicky wrote:
> What does the usage letters mean in the key listing?
> usage: CS
> usage: SEA
> What does SEA stand for? I think S and E stand for Signing and Encryption
> respectively but what about A and C?
C = Certifying.
A = Authentication.
C is used to indicate
On Thu Sep 08 2005; 16:04, Graeme Nichols wrote:
> I have just installed the latest WinPT front-end 1.0rc2 from their web
> site. I want to use my installed gpg 1.4.2 but it will not run. It produces
> an error stating that it needs gpg 1.1 or higher. It runs OK with the
The SF.net site of Win
Am Mon, 2005-08-29 um 20.15 schrieb Ryley Breiddal:
> I'm running Outlook 2002 SP2 on Windows 2000, and whenever I try to sign
> a message, Outlook crashes. There was a report recently, archived at
> http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2005-August/026511.html
> whose symptoms match mine
Michael W. Lucas wrote:
For a long time here's been a WinPT download at www.winpt.org, which
includes GnuPG.
As of April 4 there's a GnuPG-win32 download at www.g10code.de, which
includes WinPT.
Is one more "authoritative" than the other? Where should people be
going for the One True WinPT?
On Fri Aug 12 2005; 14:52, Robin Cooper wrote:
> commands in my docs or the WinPT program.
>
> How can I revoke a signature I have added to someone else's key?
Right now this is not possible via WinPT. It supports to delete
signatures, but not to revoke them.
The code is almost available, I jus
On Thu Aug 11 2005; 13:30, Richard Sperry wrote:
> When ol2003 dumps it should dump files to a temp dir. I am attempting
> to make it dump to get you those. I am a non-checked XP Pro
> SP2. With non-checked Office 03 Pro SP1
I guess it is easier to wait for a new release. We recently found
the p
On Fri Aug 12 2005; 08:04, Olaf Gellert wrote:
> > Dr. Watson doesn't seem to get invoked, just Microsoft's
> > Error reporting.
> > I can't copy Microsoft's report content.
>
> But you could do a screenshot of the window, I guess!
Yes, but it's hard to get exactly all information we ne
On Thu Aug 11 2005; 23:28, Samuel ]slund wrote:
> Did you try + ?
> That usually takes a screenshot of the curently active window.
The problem is that the information fill propably more than _10_ screens.
Timo
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gn
On Thu Aug 11 2005; 12:29, R. Jensen wrote:
> As to permissions, I checked and I'm in the administrators group
> on my machine--I can't think what other permissions I'd need. :-)
Then it's propably a bug. But I never got such a message so it is
propably a combination of some 'events'.
> Dr.
You wrote:
> running Outlook 2003 SP1. Re-registering the plugin doesn't resolve
> the problem either. Would any log files, screen prints, etc help? If
> so, please specify and I will be glad to send them on.
No, the logging code is not complete yet. As I said, the most
valuable information is
On Wed Aug 10 2005; 13:30, R. Jensen wrote:
> and Enigmail (0.92.0.0). I signed the email there, but sent it
> to the Windows XP Pro box where I'm running Outlook 2003.
>
> On the Windows box I'm running GPG 1.41.
This is weird, I use GPG 1.4.2 and I have no problems. We definitely
need to check
On Wed Aug 10 2005; 13:44, R. Jensen wrote:
> Where can I get the 0.99.4 version? I downloaded from
> http://www.g10code.de/p-outlgpg.html last week and that is
> the 0.99.2 version I'm having problems with. The link on that
The primary site for downloads is ftp.g10code.com/pub/outlgpg.
> > use
On Wed Aug 10 2005; 17:06, R. Jensen wrote:
> and installed it. Now, in the explorer windows the dll does
> show up a 0.99.4, but the tab in Outlook says 0.99.3.
This is an error in the code. We already fixed it.
> "Save options in the registry". When I start Outlook, I
> get one that initially
On Wed Aug 10 2005; 10:50, R. Jensen wrote:
> to verify it, I get an error dialog:
>
>GPG Verify
> Invalid crypto engine
>
> My WinPT installation verifies the signature without a problem
I see you still use GPG 1.2.x. The plugin requires 1.4 and we will
provide an more informative
On Wed Aug 10 2005; 09:58, R. Jensen wrote:
> Outlook's Add-in Manager doesn't seem to know how to UNINSTALL an
> add-in. You can disable it, but that doesn't get rid of the entry. :-(
In the case of the GPG Outlook plugin, it's no problem. Just register
the new version of gpgexch.dll and the pr
Patrick Dickey wrote:
I was mistaken when I said I had to copy it into the folder. When I
ran Regsvr32, I got Load Module failed, can't find the module. But,
it was because I wasn't using quotes around the Path. I should have
IIRC, the example in the README is like "regsvr32 gpgexch" but i
Patrick Dickey wrote:
into the Windows\system32 directory. When I tried to do regsvr, I had
to move the gpgexch.dll file to the Windows\System32 folder also.
What Windows version do you use? I've never seen that this step is
needed and I tested it on 98 and XP.
What is the error or why do
Alphax wrote:
> I've got 0.9.92.0 (I don't remember where from). I was under the
> impression that the sourceforge version was no longer being maintained.
That's right. The sf.net site of WinPT is currently not actively
maintained. To download WinPT, please use http://www.winpt.org.
> > How com
On Mon Jun 20 2005; 09:08, Jason Markley wrote:
> However.I can't seem to get the plugin to work with outlook. It
> crashes every time I try to decrypt or encrypt an email. Also, there's
> no toolbar buttons on the main outlook window (for those of us that use
> the preview-pane). Are th
On Mon Jun 06 2005; 10:39, Peter Schott wrote:
> Current running WinPT and the Outlook plugin. Those would be the only
> programs I can think of that would be touching the keyring.
As I said, WinPT never writes the files directly. I heard about one or
two where something similar happened, but no
On Fri Jun 03 2005; 13:16, Peter Schott wrote:
> I will sometimes start my PC and when the WinPT program launches, I have
> a 0-byte pubring or secring. I have backups, but I am a little
I heard about this problem one or two times, but fact is that WinPT never
writes to the keyring directly. The
On Sun Apr 10 2005; 23:42, Johan Wevers wrote:
> Hmmm. I see win98 still being used a lot, but ME was such a crappy version
> that I rarely see it. Win98SE is often installed when refurbishing old
And 98 is no problem because SE comes with a proper version.
> I see no problem with this. For the
On Sat Apr 09 2005; 22:41, Erpo wrote:
> It's ok to list Windows NT 4 as a requirement for running a program, if
> that's really the only requirement. It's ok to list Windows NT 4 with
[snip]
Then I guess the easiest way is that I remove the 'supports 95/NT'
string because I expect at least an a
On Thu Apr 07 2005; 08:36, Thomas Kippenberg wrote:
> which means, that the system was not able to find the procedure entry
> point "SHGetSpecialFolderPathA" in the SHELL32.dll.
Hmm, it works with 98 (no SE).
> The version of my SHELL32.dll is 4.00.
That's the problem. You need 4.32 (or anyth
Johan Wevers wrote:
machine, GnuPG worked fine but WinPT gave the error that WS_32.dll
was missing. Can I just copy that file from a newer windows version?
Yes. I also did it in the past. It works.
Is win95 supported at all?
Do you ask if WinPT still supports W95? Not really. It works without
any
On Sun Mar 20 2005; 20:00, David Vallier wrote:
> Recently I tried signing a file using winpt-0.9.90rc1 and right after
> words I get a "box" popping up saying what? with 2 5-6 digit numbers
> separated by a slash and what appears to be a progress bar below that,
Yes, this is a well known problem
On Thu Mar 17 2005; 15:22, Anonymous wrote:
> winptee: This is a collection of gpg utilities, unfortunatly the explorer
> extentions (context menu) do not appear to be open source.
All parts of WinPTEE are free software (GPL). But WinPTEE is obsolete and
should not be used anymore. The successor
44 matches
Mail list logo
