Hi,
* Bruce Cowin wrote (2007-02-13 08:06):
>As I understand it, people only need my public key if they are going to
>encrypt a file for me. If I will only be sending them encrypted files, then I
>need their public key but they don't need mine. Is this correct?
Yup.
They will also need your
Hi,
* Werner Koch wrote (2007-01-05 14:58):
>Shall we start to measure contributions by the number of source code
>lines [...]?
That;
would;
be;
a;
really;
good;
idea!;
Thorsten
--
War is God's Way to teach geography to Americans.
pgpHziGbYDvBu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
* John W. Moore III wrote (2006-12-12 16:09):
>What are the practical benefits behind:
>
>"Removed the use of g10defs.h.
>This required some code cleanups and the introduction of
>a few accessor ducntions in mpi."
>
>Being 'Old School' enough to believe "if it ain't broke. don't fix it" I
>wou
Hi,
* Andrew Myers wrote (2006-11-29 13:21):
>CIVS originally sent text/plain emails. But it was useful to be able to
>embed links and to preserve election description formatting. The HTML it
>sends is pretty minimal -- I don't think it should set off reasonable
>spam filters.
I also picked th
Hi,
* Mark Smith wrote (2006-08-26 15:51):
>I've just installed GnuPG and Enigmail for my Thunderbird client.
>During the installation process of Enigmail, the wizard changes some
>options including changing composition and reading of emails in plain
>text rather than HTML.
This installer is full
Hi,
* Julia Dashkevich wrote (2006-04-17 10:25):
>Having gone through the setup and key generation, it
>was necessary to make my public key available on the
>web keyserver. Is it true that if i publish it there
>my email address (which comes in the user id) may
>become a target for spammers?
Yes,
Hi,
* Thorsten Haude wrote (2005-12-28 10:46):
>If possible, attach one of your mails from your outbound folder and
>from the list folder. (I'm not sure the others would approve though,
>so send the mails to me privately. Let's keep the discussion on the
>list though.)
So
Hi,
* Thomas Widhalm wrote (2005-12-28 22:50):
>So how do you deal with signatures? Is it irresponsible signing keys just with
>because of them being on a website with a fingerprint? Is it sufficient if
>you give "haven't checked anything" or "checked marginally" while signing. Or
>is this just
Hi,
* Chris wrote (2005-12-28 00:45):
>> * Chris wrote (2005-12-27 03:30):
>> >On the Mandriva Newibe list signatures using OpenPGP/MIME show up as
>> >bad while those using Inline OpenPGP show up as good.
>>
>They make it to the list, however, they show up this way using OpenPGP/MIME:
>
>Message
Hi,
* John Clizbe wrote (2005-12-27 04:08):
>You could try Thunderbird + Enigmail. Enigmail will allow you to create
>per-recipient rules, so that you may send either inline-signed or
>PGP/MIME-signed messages depending on which list you're posting.
Mutt can do that, too.
>You can't spell fiasc
Hi,
* Chris wrote (2005-12-27 03:30):
>On the Mandriva Newibe list signatures using OpenPGP/MIME show up as
>bad while those using Inline OpenPGP show up as good.
They show up as good where? Are the Mails coming back from the list
not verifyable? Is there some kind of status attached?
Thorsten
Hi,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (2005-12-25 17:58):
>this avoids
>the e-mail client or pgp wrapping them
>in places i don't want,
>
>and (at least for me)
>is easier to read and follow
So you read you own mails a lot?
I think you text is harder to read by fragment it the way you do.
Thorsten
--
Hi,
* Chris wrote (2005-12-25 20:29):
>On Sunday 25 December 2005 11:54 am, Thorsten Haude wrote:
>> * Chris wrote (2005-12-25 17:22):
>> >I know that is probably a lame question, however, I'm on several mailing
>> >lists that are bouncing my messages back to me b
Hi,
* Chris wrote (2005-12-25 17:22):
>I know that is probably a lame question, however, I'm on several mailing
>lists that are bouncing my messages back to me because they are signed. The
>list owners are telling me this is because they don't allow attachments.
Mutt adds a 'Content-Disposition
14 matches
Mail list logo