Werner Koch via Gnupg-users writes:
> Hi!
>
> while talking about gpgv, let me remind you about the new
> --assert-signer option which can be used as a replacement for gpgv.
>
> --assert-signer fpr_or_file
>
> This option checks whether at least one valid signature on file has
> be
vuori writes:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:50:39AM +0200, Simon Josefsson via Gnupg-users
> wrote:
>> Are there well-maintained debian packages for GnuPG 2.4 anywhere? I
>> recently ran into yet another bug that has been fixed in later versions
>> that Debian/Trisquel d
Werner Koch via Gnupg-users writes:
> I am sorry, for the Debian troubles - we actually had 2.3 in Sid already
> 2 years ago. AFAICS the problem is that the Debian maintainer seems to
> be in a conflict between being Sequoia contributor and maintainer,
> OpenPGP WG Chair and also long time GnuPG
Never mind -- I realized this was a duplicate of this bug report:
https://dev.gnupg.org/T5935
I will try to work on getting a newer GnuPG into Guix as a solution.
/Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-user
Hi.
When I SSH with gpg-agent's ssh-agent emulation, this happens:
jas@kaka ~$ ssh root@192.168.10.186
sign_and_send_pubkey: signing failed for ED25519 "cardno:FFFE 42315277" from
agent: agent refused operation
root@192.168.10.186: Permission denied (publickey).
jas@kaka ~$
Tracking it down, i
