On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 18:15 +0100, Werner Dittmann wrote:
> I've the same problem with an SCM 535. By running the pcscd in
> forgroung with debug enabled I got the follwoing messages:
>
have you tried posting directly the muscle's mailing list ?
http://lists.drizzle.com/pipermail/muscle/
Ludovi
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 10:00 +0100, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
> You don't believe me to enter 9 times a complete passphrase, do you?
> You are right, that it is possible to live with it, but why not
> implement something more comfortable if it doesn't lower the security
> level?
>
>
> While pgpdum
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 08:01 -0800, Tracy D. Bossong wrote:
> gpg --list-packets should give you a clue
>
Yes true! I'm not use using it cos it's only mentioned in man page and
not in help (and I don't rtfm enough ;)
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 09:59 +0100, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
> If you are the third recipient, you have to give 6 times a wrong
> password until you can finally input the correct one. This gets real
> fun when there are ten recipients...
>
> It would be nice, if
> 1. gpg would take the password an
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 04:37 +0100, Nikola Lečić wrote:
> Sebastien, thank you for the reply.
>
> That's exactly why I asked: I can't do this. :-) It seems that GnuPG
> always wants me to return to the public ring:
>
OK, I misunderstood your question.
> %gpg --edit-key 7B063EAA
> [...]
> Secr
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 23:22 +0100, Nikola Lečić wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:37:10 +0100
> Nikola Lečić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I wasn't aware that one had to 'save' a key immediately after deleting
> > a subkey (using delkey)
Hi,
I can't find how list who's a file encrypted for ? I've encrypt several
files with different recipients, but I don't remember which.
In general how can I make difference between file encrypted for one
user, several user ? symmetric encrypted, asymmetric ?
Thank you.
--
Sebastien
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 18:29 -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On Tue January 29 2008, you wrote:
> > I understand what you're saying, but I don't see the problem. If you
> > want to add another user ID (what people usually mean when they say "add
> > another email address"), then you add another us
