Hi,
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Werner Koch wrote:
Obviously there are some kludges in the system to allow sending of
signed messages by taking great care not to modify the content.
A remark on these kludges: an S/MIME email from a colleague elsewhere
using Outlook and their Exchange server was stil
Hi,
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:07:53 +0100 (BST) Phil Brooke articulated:
Nothing relating to encrypted data, but I've seen an MS Exchange
system rewrite signed emails (both PGP/MIME and S/MIME) with the
obvious effect of causing failed verifications.
Coul
Hi,
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, David Smith wrote:
Does anyone have any experience of using an MS Exchange server, where it
corrupts PGP-MIME emails by re-encoding the encrypted data in base64?
[...]
(I'm rather late to this thread, but anyway)
Nothing relating to encrypted data, but I've seen an
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, David Shaw wrote:
There is actually a defined field for this in OpenPGP (see section
5.2.3.22, Signer's User ID). I don't think anyone implements it though.
Is there any particular difficulty or reason for it not being implemented
by anyone? (It looks very similar to, fo
Hi,
I'm a bit confused about --sig-notation. Suppose I detach-sign a file; is it
reasonable to use notations to briefly comment on it? e.g.,
--sig-notation [EMAIL PROTECTED]"This loan application is approved."
(Not dealing with loans really, but needed some example)
Is the notation part o
