Re: gpg: AES-128 test encryption failed

2009-04-01 Thread Petr Uzel
m/show_bug.cgi?id=443693 -- Best regards / s pozdravem Petr Uzel, Packages maintainer - SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. e-mail: pu...@suse.cz Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 964 190 00

gpg-agent does not know --homedir, --batch and --lc-type options

2009-02-19 Thread Petr Uzel
pu...@foxbat:~> gpg-agent --homedir gpg-agent[11128]: invalid option "--homedir" pu...@foxbat:~> gpg-agent --version gpg-agent (GnuPG) 2.0.10 libgcrypt 1.4.1 Is this a bug in GnuPG, documentation, both, or did I miss something? Thanks in advance, -- Best regards / s

Re: GnuPG 2.0.10 - t-convert test fails on ppc and s390

2009-01-19 Thread Petr Uzel
space. */ > - need_nul = !(s[-2] == '0' && s[-1] == '0'); > + /* We need to append a nul character. However we don't want that if > + the hexstring already ends with "00". */ > + need_nul = ((s == hexstring) || !(s[-2] == '0' &&a

Re: GnuPG 2.0.10 - t-convert test fails on ppc and s390

2009-01-19 Thread Petr Uzel
test account on one of these machines. I'd like to, but I can't as those are suse internal machines. Sorry. I'll try to look at it with a debugger... -- Best regards / s pozdravem Petr Uzel, Packages maintainer ---

GnuPG 2.0.10 - t-convert test fails on ppc and s390

2009-01-19 Thread Petr Uzel
-- Best regards / s pozdravem Petr Uzel, Packages maintainer - SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. e-mail: pu...@suse.cz Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 964 190 00 Prague 9

Re: confusing message: 'no pinentry'

2008-09-23 Thread Petr Uzel
Dne Tuesday 02 of September 2008 16:15:02 Petr Uzel napsal(a): > Hi, > > Dne Tuesday 02 of September 2008 15:59:22 Steve Revilak napsal(a): > > Is there a pinentry in root's path? > > Yes, it is in /usr/bin/pinentry (and /usr/bin is in root's path). In > o

Re: confusing message: 'no pinentry'

2008-09-02 Thread Petr Uzel
justed somehow. In other words, I know how to solve my issue (use 'su -'/unset GPG_AGENT_INFO/killall gpg-agent/whatever), but I'm uncertain that all other gpg users know it too. Especially when the message about missing pinentry is quite confusing. -- Best reg

confusing message: 'no pinentry'

2008-09-02 Thread Petr Uzel
to root with 'su -', gpg works fine. So the question is : - is this a behavior a bug (using 'foreign' gpg-agent) ? - if it is not a bug, shouldn't the error message be adjusted somehow ? (as it has nothing to do with pinentry IMHO) Thanks, -- Bes