> On Jan 5, 2015, at 7:54 AM, Sandeep Murthy wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have a couple of questions about key generation, subkeys and the
> documentation
> on gnupg.org.
>
> (FYI I have GnuPG/MacGPG (v. 2.0.26) on my Mac.)
>
> 1. I just tried to generate an RSA keypair using `gpg` on the command lin
watched the video, its amazing how much is broken and that GPG and OTR are not.
> On Dec 31, 2014, at 5:20 AM, Nicolai Josuttis wrote:
>
> OK,
> for those who didn't have time to see the talk at 31C3
> as a whole and therefore wondering why this is an important talk,
> let me point out and quot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/24/2014 10:57 AM, Hauke Laging wrote:
> Am Di 24.06.2014, 09:50:04 schrieb Nex6|Bill:
>
>> anykind of "best practice", should be simple, so that it
>> encourages a sane baseline for people.
>
> That depends
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/24/2014 10:52 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> I recently, generated a new keypair (GPG4win), and the defaults
>> presented where RSA/2048. I did, some digging around on the RSA
>> vs DSA thing and RSA still seems to be the recommended way to go,
I just finished reading the article, I don't know anyone who does all of those
things. most people I know
who are advid GPG users, gen a key, maybe a revoke, upload it to a keyserver
sometimes. and that's about it.
using subkeys, offline keys etc, adds way more complexity to something arguably
I recently, generated a new keypair (GPG4win), and the defaults presented where
RSA/2048. I did, some digging around on the RSA vs DSA thing and RSA still seems
to be the recommended way to go, the only thing I did was up my key size to
4096 I left all the other defaults.
On Monday, Jun
