Is there anyone in the Chicago area who would be willing and able to meet me to
sign my GPG key? Yes, I have looked on Biglumber and contacted several people
from there. Yes, I have searched for WoT groups in the area. No, not one
person has met with me yet. I will only be in Chicago for the ne
Is there anyone in the Chicago area who would be willing and able to meet me
to sign my GPG key? Yes, I have looked on Biglumber and contacted several
people from there. Yes, I have searched for WoT groups in the area.
If you, or someone you know, is in the Chicago area and would be able to
meet
I would think people on this list would be interested in this:
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=4207&rss
All I can say is "wow"...
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
und
> gpg: --logger-file: unknown suffix
> gpg: gpg_logfile.txt: unknown suffix
>
> C:\LoadScripts>
>
> To answer your questions:
> 1) I changed the Start In location for the scheduled task to point to
> the location of the encrypted file. Made no difference.
> 2) Also tri
gt; This was the only way I found to automate the process. But
> regardless, nothing gets logged.
>
>
> -Original Message- From: Neal Dudley
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 7:55
> AM To: Dorroh, Brian Subject: Re: Decyrption via scheduled task fails
>
>
>
Karl Voit wrote:
> Our communication partners have to check the signature of our
> employees keys and its up to our partners that they check from time
> to time wether there was a change in the relationship between our
> employees and out company key - I guess this is the most difficult
> part.
NO
Some points to consider:
Regardless of whether or not the company signing key has signed or
revoked it's signature on the user's signing key, it is ultimately up to
the employee to trust or not trust the other employee's key(s). This is
one of the beautiful points of PGP/GPG - there is no third p
I" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Neal Dudley wrote:
>> Sounds like I should just regenerate a new 1024 bit RSA primary signing key
>> and copy it to the card (and an encryption subkey as well, of course).
>
> Pl
On decrypting, add ³--output filename², or ³-o filename² for the short form,
to output to the file ³filename².
On 3/4/08 12:34 AM, "Elmer Espinosa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm new with GNUPG. I used the command gpg -s file to encrypt the file. to
> decrpyt the file I used gpg -d file, but t
Sounds like I should just regenerate a new 1024 bit RSA primary signing key
and copy it to the card (and an encryption subkey as well, of course).
Thank you for your help!
On 3/3/08 7:47 PM, "David Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Neal Dudley
Why can keys not be signed with a signing subkey rather than a primary
signing key? I just learned of this after going to my first signing party.
Perhaps I have misunderstood the purpose of subkeys.
I have read that it is good practice to create a primary signing key, and
then use subkeys on the
11 matches
Mail list logo
