checked the bzip2 issue, and
I have the latest version, still bzip2 will since recently not work on
my machine. Maybe I need to recompile both bzip2 and gnupg from
scratch? Is the bzip2 vulnerability fixed?
Sincerely yours,
藻留天 具留部覧度船
Morten Gulbrandsen
___
om an identity, and the
corresponding private key to be calculated from the public key.
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5091.txt
Looks insecure to me.
Sincerely yours,
藻留天 具留部覧度船
Morten Gulbrandsen
_
Java programmer, C++ pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Kalyana_SBS wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are trying to install gnupg on Sun Solaris Box.
>
>
>
> We are trying to figure out which version of C compiler is most suitable
> for compiling the source code on Solaris box.
>
>
I got mine from blas
6MAgAISgALY3JlYXRpb25fdHNJABVlbmN
yeXB0aW9uX2tleV9sZW5ndGhJAApudW1fc2hhcmVzSQAJdGhyZXNob2xkSQAJdGltZW91dF9oSgAGdmRvX2lkTAAUZW5jcnlwdGlvbl9hbGdv
cml0aG10ABJMamF2YS9sYW5nL1N0cmluZztMAA9lbmNyeXB0aW9uX21vZGVxAH4ACnhwAAABIkcjCoUAAACACgcITEjPY9yDp
sh0AANBRVN0AANDQkPaxwpTkdhvG0nYDtLWr2PF
- -END VANISH MESSAGE-
Sincerely yours,
ciphertext.
And opened the output in ghex2.
blurb does the trick. If you want to encrypt or decrypt a msg to
yourself or someone able to run blurb. Then it is a good bet.
If OpenSSL supports blowfish, why is it incompatible to blurb?
Sincerely yours,
Morten Gulbrandsen
主バイトホイットフィールド
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi List readers,
thanks to David Shaw for the nice URL:
http://www.moserware.com/2009/09/stick-figure-guide-to-advanced.html
This one I like very much; The pencil and paper approach.
>
> Also, here's the Stick Figure Guide to AES:
>
> http://www
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
BosseB wrote:
> I have a number of encrypted files, which I need to decrypt. I have
> installed GPG 1.4.9 on my Windows XP-Pro SP3 PC. I have the necessary
> keyrings and they work with Thunderbird and Enigmail.
>
> But as I said I need to decrypt fil
d deploy chinese
internet censorship.
===
some of the urls can be difficult to access but google and other search
engines may dig them up. It is an attempt to enforce key escrow. Or an
attempt to destroy open source encryption. It has been rumored that
since GnuPG was funded wi
-1.4.9.tgz (sh)
you find more here
http://www.google.com/BSD
search for openbsd gnupg 1.4.9
Gnu is ported to OpenBSD without the linux emulation sometimes otherwise
needed.
Also the command line options for the UNIX native C and C++ compilers
are different than what is Gnu Standard.
Sincere
and if it will ever work the
way marketing wants us to swallow SIM cards, RFIDs and whatever new cool
and fancy stuff industry and government may design together:
Chips in official IDs raise privacy fears
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hHq9P54bYfXbHp-aDgs01gePq1twD99CDMT00
signature depends on options you choose. The actual information for your
digital signature is embedded in the PDF. Only PDFs with Reader Rights
enabled can be signed.
===
can I also sign and encrypt ? AES256?
Sincerely yours,
Morten Gulbrandsen
主バイトホイットフィールド
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Mearns wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 02:21:29AM -0700, littleBrain wrote:
>>> Does anyone have the UNIX API documentation for GPG?
>>>
/***SNIP***/
> response? Not that this won't wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
littleBrain wrote:
> Does anyone have the UNIX API documentation for GPG?
>
> Please reply to this thread. That would be very much helpful..
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> ~
> littleBrain
Dear littleBrain
I do run Unix,
Solaris is certified as UNIX
13 matches
Mail list logo
