Sorry, forgot a critical trick or maybe 2, should have just pasted the
script in the first place:
#!/bin/bash
#
# https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=gnupg.git;a=blob;f=README
set -e
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
pushd npth
./autogen.sh --force
./configure --enab
Are you also building the required support libraries?
I have recently build 2.2.8 successfully using this set of support libs:
git checkout npth-1.5
git checkout libgpg-error-1.31
git checkout libgcrypt-1.8.2
git checkout libksba-1.3.5
git checkout libassuan-2.5.1
git checkout gnupg-2.2.8
then r
As a followup: I have done some tracing of the code, found that the
GPGME_DELETE_FORCE flag to gpgme_op_delete_ext causes a --yes option to be
added to the gpg command. I confirmed on command line that the behavior is
the same there: --yes does not suppress the "are you sure" graphic dialog
boxes
Hi,
I've been trying to use the GPGME_DELETE_FORCE flag in gpgme_op_delete_ext,
but I'm still getting not one, but two "Do you really want to delete..."
prompts popping up, one for the secret key, one for the sub-key. I am
using GPGme version 1.11.1 in combination with gpg 2.2.8 (as confirmed by
r
Hi,
I'm trying to work with gpgme to manage public/private key pairs on a
keyring, but also use these keys with libgcrypt for signing, verifying
signatures, etc. without interacting with gpg or the keyring...
I've found and used the functions like:
https://www.gnupg.org/documentation/manuals/gpgm
Errata,
3 - Compute SHe = sk^d mod n
of course really meant:
3 - Compute SHe = SH^d mod n
Mike
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
eys with new
updates, but does it provide a mechanism for multiple authentications on a
single message? ( Like: SHe1+SHe2...+SHeN+"Authenticated message" ? )
Thanks,
Mike
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Peter Lebbing
wrote:
> On 11/04/18 14:51, Mike Inman wrote:
> > Encrypt the
*** Correcting one, somewhat important, word ***
Hi Dirk & Ken,
I'm working on a similar problem... automated decryption "in the field" and
what I have come to is this:
Encrypt the message with a symmetric algorithm, adding salt and a
hash/checksum to ensure validity. Then, taking that result a
Hi Dirk & Ken,
I'm working on a similar problem... automated decryption "in the field" and
what I have come to is this:
Encrypt the message with a symmetric algorithm, adding salt and a
hash/checksum to ensure validity. Then, taking that result and signing
with a private key.
In the field - the
Hi,
I'm working with libgcrypt in a CentOS 7 distribution that includes version
1.5.3... I'd like to use GCRY_CIPHER_MODE_CCM but this
https://markmail.org/message/pavkgenzrd4mmbpu makes me think that it isn't
available in 1.5.3?
Is there an easy table of what features became stable in libgcrypt
FWIW, here's the log entry from an attempt to use gpgme_set_passphrase_cb
on a symmetric encryption. For some reason I still cannot figure out, my
callback function isn't being used, the system prompt still appears (twice,
once to confirm.)
GPGME 2018-03-21 18:58:18 <0x6205> gpgme_release: cal
Thanks Werner,
I did that, saw the call to gpg2 (2.0.28, libcrypt 1.6.3), tried changing
the engine to /usr/bin/gpg ( using gpgme_ctx_set_engine_info( ctx,
GPGME_PROTOCOL_OpenPGP, "/usr/bin/gpg", NULL ) ) and that worked under
Ubuntu.
Now, my target environment is CentOS 7, and they resolve /usr
_version returns 1.5.5 and gpg
--version returns 1.4.18 in Ubuntu 15.10
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Mike Inman
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
13 matches
Mail list logo
